roytennant.com :: planet

Roy Tennant's Planet

August 27, 2010

TechCrunch

SecondMarket And StockTwits Team Up To Let You Tweet About Private Company Stock

StockTwits has built a business out of people tweeting their thoughts and actions around various public stocks. SecondMarket has built a business out of people interested in the buying and selling of various private stocks. It seems only natural to shove the two together. Which is exactly what they're doing today with a new partnership. As you may be aware, to send a tweet to StockTwits, you have to append the "$SYMBOL" syntax to your tweet. The same idea will now work with these private stocks that SecondMarket tracks. For example, if you're interested in TechCrunch stock, you'd tweet your thoughts with "$TCRH" appended on to the tweet. For Facebook, you'd use "$FBOOK". For Twitter, "$TWIT". And so on.

by MG Siegler at August 27, 2010 08:33 PM

New York Times OPEN

TimesOpen Mobile/Geolocation: Speaker Lineup

Next Thursday, Sept. 2, we're hosting our first in a series of TimesOpen events: TO2.0: Mobile/Geolocation. We have a stellar group of speakers lined up to talk about all things mobile/geo.

by By DEREK GOTTFRID at August 27, 2010 07:07 PM

O'Reilly Radar

Applying the lessons of Enterprise 2.0 to Gov 2.0

Last year, MIT professor Andrew McAfee published a landmark book on the business use and impact of social software platforms titled Enterprise 2.0: New Collaborative Tools for Your Organization’s Toughest Challenges. The book is a collection of McAfee's research since the spring of 2006 when he coined the phrase Enterprise 2.0. Shorthand for enterprise social software, Enterprise 2.0 is the strategic integration of Web 2.0 technologies into an organization's intranet, extranet, and business processes. Those technologies, including wikis, blogs, prediction markets, social networks, microblogging, and RSS, have in turn been adopted by government agencies, a phenomenon that falls under the mantle of Gov 2.0. As the use of such technology has grown, Congress is now considering the risks and rewards of Web 2.0 for federal agencies.

Gov 2.0 Summit, 2010The insights McAfee has gained from years of research into the use of social software by large organizations have broad application to understanding how and where technology will change government, and it's the basis for his talk, New Collaborative Tools for Government's Toughest Challenges, at the Gov 2.0 Summit in Washington D.C. I spoke in detail with Andrew, and anyone interested in understanding how social software is being used in large organizations will find the full half-hour audio interview of great interest.

Below are the questions I asked, and timestamps for the audio of where they start if readers want to jump ahead.

andrew_mcafee1.jpg

How is Enterprise 2.0 different from Web 2.0? And how does it apply to so-called Government 2.0? What do rules and regulations mean for the growth of social software? What does this mean for open government?
(Answer begins at 4:55)

Does automated filtering hold promise for government or the enterprise to prevent sensitive information from leaking? (Answer begins at 7:13)

Do reports of exfiltration of data from intelligence agencies mean collaborative software is a risk? (Answer begins at 8:35)

One of the examples in Enterprise 2.0 is Intellipedia. What lessons does its creation and evolution hold for the intelligence agencies? What about other government entities? (Answer begins at 9:52)

My interview with Sean Dennehy and Don Burke, the two CIA officers who have spearheaded the Intellipedia effort since its inception, is embedded below:

One of the most interesting parts of the book, for me, was the discussion of ideation platforms and collective intelligence. Government agencies are really running with the concept, including the upcoming launch of Challenge.gov. Innocentive shows another model. But does crowdsourcing really work? When, and under what conditions? What are the lessons from the private sector and academia in that regard? (Answer begins at 15:00)

You can read more about how game mechanics and crowdsourcing were combined to solve a complex challenge at Professor McAfee's blog.

What are the most common mistakes in implementations of social software, or ESSPs as you call them? Specifically, how do you set up effective crowdsourcing platforms? (Answer begins at 19:10)

What did the MIT "balloon team" that won the DARPA Network Challenge do right? (Answer begins at 21:09)

What challenges - and opportunities does the incoming millennial workforce hold for government and business with respect to IT? What does research show about how boomers, Gen Xers, and millennials interact, collaborate and work? Are there some myths to bust with respect to entrepreneurship and innovation? (Answer begins at 23:29)

What are the cultural issues around adoption of Enterprise 2.0 and Gov 2.0? (Answer begins at 27:07)

What does your new research on the strategic implementation of IT in large enterprises show to date? Why does government lag the private sector in this area, in the so-called "IT gap?" What could be done about it? (Answer begins at 30:03)

by Alex Howard at August 27, 2010 04:50 PM

Ed Summers

simplicity and digital preservation, sorta

Over on the Digital Curation discussion list Erik Hetzner of the California Digital Library raised the topic of simplicity as it relates to digital preservation, and specifically to CDL’s notion of Curation Microservices. He referenced a recent bit of writing by Martin Odersky (the creator of Scala) with the title Simple or Complicated. In one of the responses Brian Tingle (also of CDL) suggested that simplicity for an end user and simplicity for the programmer are often inversely related. My friend Kevin Clarke prodded me in #code4lib into making my response to the discussion list into a blog post so, here it is (slightly edited).

For me, the Odersky piece is a really nice essay on why simplicity is often in the eye of the beholder. Often the key to simplicity is working with people who see things in roughly the same way. People who have similar needs, that are met by using particular approaches and tools. Basically a shared and healthy culture to make emergent complexity palatable.

Brian made the point about simplicity for programmers having an inversely proportional relationship to simplicity for end users, or in his own words:

I think that the simpler we make it for the programmers, usually the more complicated it becomes for the end users, and visa versa.

I think the only thing to keep in mind is that the distinction between programmers and end users isn’t always clear.

As a software developer I’m constantly using, or inheriting someone else’s code: be it a third party library that I have a dependency on, or a piece of software that somebody wrote once upon a time, who has moved on elsewhere. In both these cases I’m effectively an end-user of a program that somebody else designed and implemented. The interfaces and abstractions that this software developer has chosen are the things I (as an end user) need to be able to understand and work with. Ultimately, I think that it’s easier to keep software usable for end users (of whatever flavor) by keeping the software design itself simple.

Simplicity makes the software easier to refactor over time when the inevitable happens, and someone wants some new or altered behavior. Simplicity also should make it clear when a suggested change to a piece of software doesn’t fit the design of the software in question, and is best done elsewhere. One of the best rules of thumb I’ve encountered over the years to help get to this place is the Unix Philosophy:

Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together.

As has been noted elsewhere, composability is one of the guiding principles of the Microservices approach–and it’s why I’m a big fan (in principle). Another aspect to the Unix philosophy that Microservices seems to embody is:

Data dominates.

The software can (and will) come and go, but we are left with the data. That’s the reality of digital preservation. It could be argued that the programs themselves are data, which gets us into sci-fi virtualization scenarios. Maybe someday, but I personally don’t think we’re there yet.

Another approach I’ve found that works well to help ensure code simplicity has been unit testing. Admittedly it’s a bit of a religion, but at the end of the day, writing tests for your code encourages you to use the APIs, interfaces and abstractions that you are creating. So you notice sooner when things don’t make sense. And of course, they let you refactor with a safety net, when the inevitable changes rear their head.

And, another slightly more humorous way to help ensure simplicity:

Always code as if the person who ends up maintaining your code is a violent psychopath who knows where you live.

Which leads me to a jedi mind trick my former colleague Keyser Söze Andy Boyko tried to teach me (I think): it’s useful to know when you don’t have to write any code at all. Sometimes existing code can be used in a new context. And sometimes the perceived problem can be recast, or examined from a new perspective that makes the problem go away. I’m not sure what all this has to do with digital preservation. The great thing about what CDL is doing with microservices is they are trying to focus on the *what*, and not the *how* of digital preservation. Whatever ends up happening with the implementation of Merritt itself, I think they are discovering what the useful patterns of digital preservation are, trying them out, and documenting them…and it’s incredibly important work that I don’t really see happening much elsewhere.

by ed at August 27, 2010 04:21 PM

Ed Corrado

Call for chapters: Getting started with cloud computing: A LITA guide

Dear Librarian Colleagues:

Consider writing a chapter for the forthcoming book, “Getting started with cloud computing: A LITA guide”.

Edward Corrado and Heather Moulaison, editors, are looking for 8-12 page (double spaced standard font) chapters on either:

1. Applications and services used by librarians in the cloud and how they might be used in a variety of libraries, including information on:

a. The tool itself (what it does, why it could be of use to libraries)
b. Why librarians should know about this application or service

2. Descriptions of best practices/ok practices/not good practices in using cloud services, including information on:

a. The background to the project: Describe your library, your collection, your resources, or any other element that will be necessary to understand what you did and why

b. The project: Describe what you did, why you did it, who did what, and how, being sure to mention any special funding you needed or resources you used

c. The assessment: How have you assessed your project and what are the results of that assessment

Possible topics: Using Amazon S3 for backups/storage, Hosting Websites, blogs, wikis, etc., in the Cloud, Hosting Library Subject Guides in the Cloud, Using Google Docs and other Google Applications, etc.

Examples can focus on all kinds of libraries, including public, special, museum, academic, etc.

Projected deadline for chapter: Nov. 1, 2010.

Authors will receive a copy of the book as compensation.

If you are interested in submitting an idea for consideration, please send a rough outline of your proposed chapter to ecorrado@ecorrado.us before Sept. 15, 2010. Clearly indicate in your email your name, contact information, and any other information the editors should take into
consideration about the context of your proposal.

by ecorrado at August 27, 2010 03:18 PM

ALA TechSource

Asking Why

Anyone who has spent time with small children knows that "why?" is one of the best and most vexing questions people can ask. "Why?" probes for motivations, explanations, understanding. It demands reflection and clear communication, and I think it's safe to say that most people have a complex relationship with this tiny word.

Library techies can leverage "why?" to change how their organizations operate by questioning a ibrary procedure. Discussing workflow with coworkers and asking "why?" a lot, while offering ways to automate procedures, can offer value to your colleagues and your organization (and maybe wreak a little havoc). But "why?" is also a question library techs sometimes dread. "Why did it work before but not this time?" "Why is it broken?" "Why am I getting this error message?" Often the answer is straightforward: a setting has been changed, or a network problem is creating the error. But sometimes, getting to why would require an electrical engineering background and a path of inquiry beyond simply fixing the problem. Nothing is quite so frustrating as resolving a persistent error only to have your techjoy smashed to bits by a coworker disappointed because you're not quite sure why the computer stopped recognizing the printer, you only know that they're now friends again.

Before you all send me angry email: yes, most of the time, knowing why something isn't working is the key to fixing it. Computer not connecting to the Internet? Well, that frayed Ethernet cable might be the culprit. This is the third time in a year that's happened? Well, maybe we should move the cable out of the path of the vacuum. Why did your computer's Ethernet port stop working? No idea. It's dead, I installed a network card, now you're online again. If it dies again, that's a different story. A lot of troubleshooting is looking for patterns, waiting until cause and effect can be established reliably. A one-time problem doesn't always merit a full-out investigation into what runtime error number 37 means. Most IT folk seem to have a stock phrase or two: "Let's assume that it's just a hiccup, but call me if it happens again."

We can be, however, a teeny bit hypocritical about this. We get annoyed with the "why" we can't answer, but grouse that our less technical colleagues don't understand why their actions can cause problems or why their ILS doesn't work when the internet is down, or why email that's already downloaded to their computer won't show up in webmail. We want them to take our fixes on faith and also posses a clear understanding of how their network is set up.

The people who ask "why" could be the most likely to end up understanding the library's technology and the most willing to be advocates when everyone's wondering why you haven't yet fixed a big problem.

I am loathe to use a car metaphor, but it is apt. My favorite mechanics have been those who happily explain what was wrong with my car despite my rudimentary understanding of the problem. My most favorite mechanic once handed me the broken down part that was making that noise and showed me the healthy replacement (my car was up on the lift). Honestly, they looked the same to me, but I so appreciated the time he took to show me what he had done. He wasn't trying to prove anything to me, only explaining. He also clearly loved what he did and was excited both to have tracked down the problem and saved me from a horrible car accident. (It was a "you're lucky you didn't go on the highway last week" repair.) Other times when he told me he didn't know the cause of a  problem, I didn't mind because he had explained when he did know.

Most of us have had a mechanic or a doctor or someone with greater technical knowledge make us feel small and stupid and dense for even asking for an explanation. The people we return to are those who draw a quick sketch or use an analogy or simply take the time to tell us what's going on.

by Kate Sheehan at August 27, 2010 02:47 PM

Michael Stephens

Updating LIS768 List of Context Books for Student Reports

This morning I’m updating one of my favorite assignments for LIS768 Participatory Service and Emerging Technologies. Two years ago, I asked for further suggestions to share with my class. Today. I’ll do the same: what would you add? Please share in the comments below. I’ll be including the post URL in the course site.

Original post from 2008: http://tametheweb.com/2008/09/10/lis768-reading-list/

Current list included in syllabus:

Assignment – Context Book Report – 10 points

Students will read a book selected from the list provided below or suggest another title for Michael’s approval, and write a 200-300 word reflection posted to your blog relating the topic and focus of the book to libraries, technology and participatory service.

OPTIONAL: Instead of writing your report, create a media presentation such as a podcast, YouTube video, Animoto show, etc. Let your creativity flow!

Selections from the Online Reading List

  • Anderson, Chris. The Long Tail
  • Beck, John C. & Mitchell Wade. Got game
  • Bernoff, Josh. Groundswell
  • Breakenridge, Deidre. PR 2.0
  • Carr, Nicholas. The Big Switch: rewiring the World, from Edison to Google
  • Collins, Jim. Good to Great
  • Doctorow, Cory Content
  • Doctorow, Cory Little Brother
  • Frankel, Alex. Punching In
  • Fried, Jason & David Heinemeier Hannsen. Rework
  • Friedman, Thomas. The World is Flat
  • Gee, James Paul. What Video Games Have to teach Us about Learning & Literacy
  • Gilmore, James & B. Joseph Pine II. Authenticity
  • Gladwell, Malcolm. Blink
  • Gladwell, Malcolm. Outliers
  • Godin, Seth. Small is the New Big
  • Godin, Seth. Tribes
  • Godin, Seth. Linchpin
  • Heath, Chip & Dan. Switch
  • Jenkins, Henry. Convergence Culture
  • Jenkins, Henry. Fans, Bloggers & Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture
  • Johnson, Steven. Everything Bad is Good for You
  • Keen, Andrew The Cult of the Amateur
  • Kelley, Tom with Jonathan Littman. The Ten Faces of Innovation
  • Kusek, David & Gerd Leonhard. The Future of MusicLevine, Rick et al. The Cluetrain Manifesto
  • Meyer, Danny. Setting the Table
  • Palfrey, John & Urs Gasser. Born Digital
  • Penn, Mark J. Microtrends
  • Pink, Daniel. A Whole New Mind
  • Shirky, Clay. Here Comes Everybody
  • Solove, Daniel. The Future of Reputation
  • Sunstein, Cass. Infotopia
  • Tapscot, Dan. Grown Up Digital
  • Tapscott, Don & Anthony D. Williams. Wikinomics
  • Weinberger, David. Everything is Miscellaneous
  • Weinberger, David. Small Pieces Loosely Joined
  • Zittrain, Jonathan. The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It

by Michael at August 27, 2010 01:59 PM

ACRLog

Sudden Thoughts And Second Thoughts

Even Lightning Gets More Time

I like lightning talks. I have given four of them now. It’s a challenge to come up with a sensible presentation that still manages a good learning experience while hopefully entertaining the crowd. All have been in the 5 minute range. That’s precious little time to say anything of much substance – but I talk fast. To my way of thinking 5 minutes is the right amount of time for a sensible lightning talk. And it’s still challenging enough that many who try cannot complete in 5 minutes. Well I just saw a program announcement where they are offering the stupendously generous time of 3 minutes for a lightning talk. My reaction to that is “why bother?”. Is there really much of anything you can say or do of value in so short a time – and would you really want to be in the audience at this thing? Are we now having a competition to see who can come up with the shortest lightning talk program? What’s next? A 30-second lightning talk? Perhaps a lightning talk where you only get 140 characters. This is getting ridiculous.

Those Other L-School Grads Aren’t Getting Jobs and They Are Mad As Hell and Not Taking It

Have you been following what’s going on with those disgruntled law school graduates who are incredibly pissed off because no law firms are offering them high-paying jobs as soon as they are handed their diplomas? They made the choice to become lawyers, and they made the choice to go into deep debt ($100K or more is not uncommon). Now they are blaming their law schools and their career offices for misleading them about their job prospects. From a USA Today article:

A small but growing coalition of graduates, on blogs with names like “Scammed Hard” and “Shilling Me Softly,” blame their alma maters for luring them into expensive programs by overstating their employment prospects.

Then of course there is the law school graduate who calls herself Unemployed JD who is making an even bigger fuss by going on a hunger strike until law schools agree to divulge career data. That generated its own little controversy when it turned out the law school graduate behind the whole thing really did have a job. I’m not going to rehash all the details here – you can read the story if you care.

I’m not sure what to make of all this. I can understand the students getting upset if the law school recruiters and admissions advisers really did lead them to believe that 99.9% of law school grads get high-paying jobs within 6 months of graduation. But could the law schools have predicted three years ago when those students enrolled that the economy would tank and that law firms would lose lots of business. So it seems just a bit unrealistic for the students to turn around and blame the law schools.

Reading this, and knowing how the economic crisis has severely impacted libraries and their hiring practices in all sectors (both budget cuts and the slowing of retirements), it is difficult to feel any sympathy at all for law school students or lawyers. According to the USA Today article, among 2009 law school graduates, 88% are employed, and that’s down from 92% in 2007. I have no idea what percent of 2009 LIS students are employed, but I’m going to guess it’s no where near 88% – heck, I bet it’s not even 50%. So should we librarians really feel all that bad for the other L-School graduates? I don’t think so. And even if jobless LIS graduates were to go on hunger strikes, protest in the streets, run naked through the halls of Congress – do you think that even a single newspaper in this country would pay any attention (OK – maybe the running naked through the halls of Congress might attract some – after the arrests). Not a chance in hell. Did USA Today have anything to say about The Unemployed Librarian’s blog? So sorry LIS grads. It looks like the lawyers will continue to get all the “Why Won’t Anyone Hire Me” attention.

BTW, I’m glad to report that Elizabeth, the unemployed librarian, is now the Employed Librarian. So there is some good news out there on the job front.

The Accidental Academic Library Janitor: Book Review

In this fascinating account of one librarian’s act of courage in taking on responsibilities at his library that no one else would dare accept, we learn the true meaning of professional passion. The Accidental Academic Library Janitor, authored by Jack Van Der Kammp, begins when Van Der Kammp is hired as the new Interlibrary Loan Librarian at Dippinger College. For two years Van Der Kammp labors at filling requests from students and faculty, all of which registers barely a nod of recognition from his co-workers or the administration. But like all librarians who achieve accidental greatness, Van Der Kammp passes through his crucible on a wintry day in February 2008.

Though not suitable for repetition in this highly respected journal, Van Der Kammp artfully recalls the worst poop incident in the history of the Susanna D. Drake Memorial Library. While his colleagues stand by in shock and disgust, Van Der Kammp goes looking for help only to realize the regular library janitor never made it to work that day. With no one else willing to go within 10 feet of the horrific scene, Van Der Kammp explains how he grabbed the pail, mop and Lysol, took matters into his own hands, and forged his destiny as The Accidental Academic Library Janitor.

Over eight insightfully written chapters, Van Der Kammp enlightens other academic librarians on how they too can become an Accidental Academic Library Janitor. Topics cover all the vital skills for would be library janitors such as best cleansers for greasy sink goo, keeping urinal cakes where they belong, how to remove pornographic graffiti from the men’s stalls, advanced techniques for fast cleanups after library raves, and most important of all, how to stay one step ahead of the real library janitor. Van Der Kammp’s book is a timely addition to the library literature because in this period of harsh budget cuts our academic libraries are constantly threatened with the loss of the janitorial staff. And when that happens, readers of The Accidental Academic Library Janitor will be poised to jump into action. Like Van Der Kammp, they too can become a prime candidate for the American Library Association’s Milton R. Grenich Library Housekeeper of the Year Prize, awarded annually by the LLAMA Interest Group on Sanitary Facility Management. Highly recommended for all academic library collections.

by StevenB at August 27, 2010 11:41 AM

Stephen Abram

Vintage Technology

Vintage Technology: Calculators


1970s Vintage desktop and pocket calculators listed by company (128 identified brands, 583 calculators).


Calculators: Desktop
For those that like the big chunky machines

For more blasts from the past, check out Vintage Technology website.

Stephen

by admin at August 27, 2010 11:29 AM

Talking to Those Who Like Technology But Don’t Consider Its Dangers

I’ve always liked the Electronic Frontier Foundation ever since we hired Mitch Kapor years ago when we were running the Canada Online Conference and Internet World Canada.

Recently, the EFF has released a few short commercials that speak to two online information and social literacy skills and I think they migt have some use in library training programs. So here they are. Feel free to click through the original post for more info:

Talking to Those Who Like Technology But Don’t Consider Its Dangers

EFF PSA: Digital Books and License Agreements

EFF PSA: Online Behavioral Tracking

HOWTO: Maximize Facebook Privacy

And a whole lot more on Facebook . . . just search YouTube.

Stephen

by admin at August 27, 2010 11:19 AM

The Famous Netflix Slides

I love this slide set from Netflix which is their staff orientation to their cultural principles. It is designed to be read even though it is formatted as a presentation.

Culture by NetFlix:

I would love to see all companies and libraries think and live like this vision. Some do and some are too wrapped up in policies and control fixation to liberate their staff to perform with excellence. Just an opinion . . .

As we start the mini-New Year (Labour Day), let’s make some resolutions to be great!

Stephen

by admin at August 27, 2010 11:15 AM

O'Reilly Radar

Four short links: 27 August 2010

  1. Working Audio Data Demos -- the new Firefox has a very sweet audio data API and some nifty demos like delay pedals, a beat detector (YouTube) and a JavaScript text-to-speech generator. (via jamesaduncan on Twitter)
  2. Estimating the Economic Impact of Mass Digitization Projects on Copyright Holders: Evidence from the Google Book Search Litigation -- [T]he revenues and profits of the publishers who believe themselves to be most aggrieved by GBS, as measured by their willingness to file suit against Google for copyright infringement, increased at a faster rate after the project began, as compared to before its commencement. The rate of growth by publishers most affected by GBS is greater than the growth of the overall U.S. economy or of retail sales.
  3. In History-Rich Region, a Very New System Tracks Very Old Things (NY Times) -- Getty built a web database to help Jordan track its antiquities sites (and threats to them) with Google Earth satellite images. (via auchmill on Twitter)
  4. What Women Want and How Not to Give it To Them -- thought-provoking piece about the ways in which corporate diversity efforts fail. Must read.

by Nat Torkington at August 27, 2010 10:00 AM

Google

Find out what’s hot on search with the Google Beat

Every day, there are more than a billion searches for information on Google. Have you ever wondered what those searches are about—or whether what you’re searching for also happens to be on the minds of millions of others across the country? We’re introducing a new way to find out—a regular video series called the Google Beat that highlights some of the hottest searches on Google in the U.S.

Using data from Google Trends, Google Insights for Search and some additional tools, the Google Beat will give you a snapshot of some of the topics that prompted people to turn to the web over the past week. You’ve probably seen our previous deep dives into Google search trends, like our annual year-end Zeitgeist and posts here about search trends related to events like the World Cup, the Oscars® and beyond. Searches can be unexpected, and sometimes what’s popular one week could never have been predicted the week before (think of Falcon Heene, last October’s “balloon boy” or Steven Slater). We’re looking forward to seeing what our data will reveal.

Check out this week’s premier video below, and subscribe to the Google Beat YouTube channel to get regular updates. We hope you enjoy.



by A Googler (noreply@blogger.com) at August 27, 2010 07:56 AM

Terry Reese

What I did this week

So, with the summer winding down, I decided to take the family for a bit of a vacation – and then took a vacation day on my own with my dad.  Here’s a few pictures of the adventures.

Travelling with the family

Because of my injury this summer, my wife and I have been taking the kids all over Oregon to do a little hiking and exploring some of the real treasures in the state.  This week, we decided to go an look at a few things that you cannot find anywhere but in Oregon – the John Day Fossil Beds and the Painted Hills. 

The John Day Fossil Beds are an incredible treasure in the state.  Its is one of the few places in the world (maybe the only place in the world) that contains fossils from 4 continues eras from around 65 MA – 5 MA.  Because of this, the research done at John Day is often used to check and correlate research done elsewhere in the world.  Aside from being unique – it is incredibly beautiful.  The layers in the rocks represent different eras of lava flow or ash flows.  This creates incredible blues, reds, yellows and greens.  What’s more, fossils basically are just laying on the ground.  Scratch the surface of the ground and you’ll find fossils of plants that haven’t existed in Oregon for millions of years. 

Within the Fossil beds are what are called the painted hills.  These represent some of the oldest geographic layers and are simply brilliant.   Here’s a few pictures:

P1010269
Picture in the Blue Basin

P1010295  
Research office in the Visitors Center where you can watch them studying collected fossils.

P1010301
Painted Hills

P1010300 
Painted Hills

P1010361 
Clarno Unit Palisades (Petrified Forest)

P1010347
Boys finding fossils in Fossil, OR

My mini Vacation – Climbing South Sister

After driving all over eastern Oregon, my wife dropped me off in Bend, Oregon, so I could hitch a ride with my dad to South Sister.  The South Sister is the 3rd highest peak in Oregon at 10,300+ ft.  The trail to the top is non-technical, but difficult.  From the trail head, climbers gain nearly 6000 ft climbing up sharp, and loose volcanic rock.  

Leaving at a little after 7 am this morning, my Dad and I managed to grind our way up the hill in about 4-4 1/2 hours.  And our reward for all the work – nearly 60 mph winds at the top of the mountain that literately nearly blew me off the peak.  So, we decided not to spend much time at the top of the mountain, but did manage to get some great pictures before retreating to a safer area. 

The way down the hill was tricky.  While we were climbing, we didn’t think anything of the loose rocks.  But on the way down, they made coming down a bit more difficult.  Even more so for me since my right arm isn’t anywhere close to 100%.  Fortunately, we made it through the loose stuff, then ran down the rest of the hill.  So coming off the mountain only took about 2 hours, jogging at a brisk pace.  Here are a few of the pictures from the top:

P1010385
Looking south

P1010384
Devils Lake (I think)

We were actually really fortunate that we got up and down the mountain when we did.  After getting to the bottom of the trail, we looked up and the top of the mountain was completely covered with clouds.  On Sisters, that’s not a good thing.  Even though the freezing level was likely around 14,000 ft today, it was very likely that anyone still on the mountain had to deal with higher winds, freezing rain and some real nasty weather.  So we really lucked out.

–TR

by Administrator at August 27, 2010 04:11 AM

Nicole Engard

August 26, 2010

BlogJunction

Webinar: Creating A Virtual Orientation for New Staff

We’re heading into a second week of double-header online WebJunction events and hope to see you there! This week’s Digitization and Preservation Symposium was attended by more than 500 people (!) and included the usual buzz of resource and idea sharing throughout.  Be sure to review the archive and the questions and links gleaned from chat.

If you missed the first two sessions in the Libraries and Economic Development Series, you can still register for Tuesday’s final session, Going to Your Customer – Outreach and Strategic Partnerships, to learn how to boost your community’s economic development.

And if you’re involved in training of any sort, the second webinar next week is not to be missed. We have Emerging Leader Group N to thank for recruiting the Baltimore County Public Library Virtual Orientation Project for this webinar.

On Wednesday September 1, 2:00 Eastern, in collaboration with ALA Learning Roundtable we’re pleased to host Creating A Virtual Orientation for New Staff. virtual orientation Orienting new staff quickly to your organization is very important. A virtual orientation could be the key to a timely, comprehensive, standardized introduction to your library system. Discover advantages to implementing a virtual orientation for your workplace. Presenters  Jean Mantegna, Sandy Lombardo, and Melissa Hepler have also shared their expertise in a recently published case study. Come join us on Wednesday if you want to hear how they planned, tested and implemented this exciting training project!

Register and preview resources »

by Jen at August 26, 2010 11:39 PM

Jonathan Rochkind

provider-neutral ebook records, help!

So any catalogers reading this, would appreciate some ideas or background information if you’ve got em. So recently, someone (PCC, the Program for Cooperative Cataloging, I guess?),  came up with this “Provider-Neutral” policy for “e-monograph” records. Which apparently is now being implemented, picking up steam. Previously, if I understand right, if there was an e-book [...]

by jrochkind at August 26, 2010 09:56 PM

Google

Call phones from Gmail

(Cross-posted from the Gmail Blog)

Gmail voice and video chat makes it easy to stay in touch with friends and family using your computer’s microphone and speakers. But until now, this required both people to be at their computers, signed into Gmail at the same time. Given that most of us don’t spend all day in front of our computers, we thought, “wouldn’t it be nice if you could call people directly on their phones?”

Starting today, you can call any phone right from Gmail.



Calls to the U.S. and Canada will be free for at least the rest of the year and calls to other countries will be billed at our very low rates. We worked hard to make these rates really cheap (see comparison table) with calls to the U.K., France, Germany, China, Japan—and many more countries—for as little as $0.02 per minute.

Dialing a phone number works just like a normal phone. Just click “Call phone” at the top of your chat list and dial a number or enter a contact’s name.


We’ve been testing this feature internally and have found it to be useful in a lot of situations, ranging from making a quick call to a restaurant, to placing a call when you’re in an area with bad reception.

If you have a Google Voice phone number, calls made from Gmail will display this number as the outbound caller ID. And if you decide to, you can receive calls made to this number right inside Gmail (see instructions).

We’re rolling out this feature to U.S. based Gmail users over the next few days, so you’ll be ready to get started once “Call Phones” shows up in your chat list (you will need to install the voice and video plug-in if you haven’t already). If you’re not a U.S. based user—or if you’re using Google Apps for your school or business—then you won’t see it quite yet. We’re working on making this available more broadly—so stay tuned!

For more information, visit gmail.com/call.

Update Aug 26: This has now been rolled out to everyone in the U.S. If you don't see the feature yet, try logging out of Gmail and signing back in.

by A Googler (noreply@blogger.com) at August 26, 2010 06:36 PM

ALA TechSource

Technology, Change, and Learning in an On-Site, Online World

The chilling fact is,  most training—around 85 percent—is wasted; it leaves learners doing exactly what they were doing before they completed a training session. Which, of course, is an incredible waste of time, money, and people for everyone involved. And the tragedy is that it doesn’t have to be this way.

So how do we beat the odds? Can technology help? In two 90-minute ALA TechSource Workshops next month, we’ll explore ways to inexpensively and effectively use technology in face-to-face and online learning. The gist of what we’re going to do together is look at ways to put the learners at the center of the process and keep technology in its place as a tool that helps us work more effectively while saving money for the organizations we serve—both by holding down expenditures and by producing better results.

We will attempt to create and nurture communities of learning, comprising well-educated staff who understand and enthusiastically embrace meaningful change.

Our first session, on September 16, will explore ways to creatively use familiar tools including Word and PowerPoint in conjunction with online resources such as YouTube, Google Docs, and SlideShare to creatively inspire learning that produces positive results. Our second session, on September 23, will take us on a major leap forward: we’ll discuss ways to apply what we do face-to-face to online settings through Skype, Google Chat, LinkedIn discussion groups, and other tools.

We’ll emphasize  low- or no-cost tools. The goal is to inspire participants to seek innovative ways to serve their colleagues, their organizations, and those they ultimately serve. And if we leave with smiles on our faces and with less stressful reactions to the words “technology” and “change,” we will have taken step toward making our world feel a little less daunting and a lot more like home.

For more information on the themes to be explored, please visit “Building Creative Bridges.”

You can register for each workshop separately for only $50, or save 15% by registering for both events for only $85.

Sign up for both sessions

Register for Session 1: Using Technology to Enhance In-Person Training
Thursday, September 16th, 2:30pm Eastern


Register for Session 2: Using Technology for Remote Training Sessions
Thursday, September 23rd, 2:30pm Eastern

 

by Paul Signorelli at August 26, 2010 05:34 PM

BlogJunction

Learn Better Together

Learn Better Together – Discover the potential of  cohort-based learning

You’ve heard the saying, “two heads are better than one.”  As we all take the journey as life-long continuous learners, this statement rings ever true. Earlier this month, Betha and I had the opportunity to explore this idea of learning together for the joint conference for Pacific Northwest Library Association & Washington Library Association. During our session (sponsored by WLA/WALT),  Learn Better Together – Discover the potential of cohort-based learning, we introduced some of the characteristics of cohort-based learning:

Learners move together through a program/event.

Learners form a group identity and engage the power of relationships.

Learners are active, not passive.

Learners take control of their learning.

We then shared 4 examples of successful cohort-based learning.  Roddenbery Memorial Library led a Library Internet Skills Cohort working to increase knowledge and use of the Internet and social media tools. The Arizona State Library facilitated a leadership skills cohort – Arizona Library Institute, Virtual Extension (ALIVE!),  a leadership program to help front line staff excel in their job at the public library  A group of librarians led the Kansas Web Conference Groupies Cohort – leveraging the 2010 Handheld Librarian Online Conference from their offices and with others in their state. WebJunction led web-conferencing and self-paced course creation cohorts helping WebJunction admins maximize the tools they had available.

Diving into a new idea or technology with others on your immediate team, in other branches or within your state is a great way to harness existing motivation and light the fire of excitement for others who aren’t quite  sure what the fuss is all about. Whether stepping in to basic internet skills, developing leadership skills, exploring handheld technology or instructional design strategies for self-paced courses, cohort-based learning can build a momentum for learning that just doesn’t happen alone.

While no learning effort is, well, effortless there are some basic steps to take to build your own learning cohort. Start small. Ask a friend to explore a new topic with you and set a time once a week to discuss or explore. Then, build that idea out with the colleagues on your floor. Before you know it, not only are you building your skills you are also sharing ideas and building relationships with others that can take your work further than ever expected.

by Kathleen at August 26, 2010 05:17 PM

Michael Stephens

On the Zukunftwerkstatt Kultur und Wissensvermittlung – Future Workshop in Germany

From Michael: Christoph Deeg of the Zukunftwerkstatt in Germany agreed to do a guest post for me outlining the origins and philosophies of this group. I spent an incredible day with the group in Berlin – and learned so much from them.  I was honored to be asked to participate as a founding member last March and am pleased Christoph agreed to write for TTW – in English!


The Zukunftwerkstatt Kultur- und Wissensvermittlung e.V. is a non-profit-organisation that brings people together who are active in public institutions or private enterprises dealing with future possibilities of mediating of cultural and scientific topics. It is the aim of our organisation to develop and realize concepts that will make knowledge society come true.  We are open to people and their ideas and consider ourselves mediators between institutions, enterprises, people and products, while not pursuing any financial interests. We are guided by the desire to find and support people of vision who believe – as we do – that cooperation at all levels will unfold new and exciting possibilities for all participants and hence for all customers or users.

Dividing lines between learning and playing, between education and entertainment are breaking down. New virtual worlds and leisure time options are evolving. Interaction, multi-optional, individual and global communication systems are gaining ground. Negotiation and utilization of knowledge in the fields of science and culture will become essential. If we acknowledge the overall scheme of things, a new means in communication will emerge with new networks and unique possibilities of cooperation: Users will gain global access to cultural and scientific subject matter. Enterprises and institutions, if cooperating closely, will gain access to millions of interested, creative and openminded users and customers. Never before have so many opportunities been better for such complex cooperation at all levels between public institutions such as libraries, museums or private enterprise as for example the games industry. And never before were we closer to realizing a knowledge and culture society, without the partners in cooperation having to give up any of their own goals.

We believe that libraries will play an important role in conveying knowledge and culture in the future. But they won`t be able to define themselves as simply providing access to knowledge, because nowadays they compete with a whole range of alternative suppliers. Libraries depend for their legitimization on the advantages, which the society that finances them draws from their services: preserving cultural heritage, promoting literacy and serving as mediators and managers of media and information.

We also believe that computer games and Web 2.0 will have a huge influence on the way cultural and scientific content will be imparted in the future. Therefore it is important to understand the culture behind these new media which is based on cooperation, transparency, interaction, trust, sharing, and having fun.

The best way to describe the modern internet is to show a picture of an soccer-stadium like the one here. The stadium itself is useless. What makes it alive are the people, the teams, the fans. All the different platforms that you can find in the internet like Facebook, Myspace, Twitter and Youtube are useless without the people that upload and share content. It is all about people not about software and it is not possible to understand anything of these new platforms only by a theoretical discussion. To understand the people the way they work and communicate, they way they care and having fun we have to become users and gamers.

While at the moment most of the libraries are trying to follow and understand trends and technologies they have to become their designers not in a technical but in a content and service orientated way.

We do not think that there is any kind of “rat race” between the traditional and the future library or between the books and the computers. There is neither a competition between gaming and seriousness. But we found out that if you start this exciting journey you will have to work hard, learn a lot and you will have fun.

Our story began in 2008 in Mannheim where we (Julia Bergmann, Jin Tan and Christoph Deeg) met at the celebration dinner in the occasion of the Bibliothekartag which is the biggest library conference in Germany and probably in Europe. We all have different backgrounds. Julia is a librarian and works as a trainer for information literacy. Jin is also a librarian. After working in a huge library in Berlin he is now on his way back to china where he amongst other things will develop new intercultural projects for the Zukunftswerkstatt. Christoph is not a librarian. After studying Jazz drums he worked  in the range of marketing and sales for the music – and the games industry. All together we come from different worlds and cultures and we still believe that this interdisciplinary background is very helpful for our work. But lets go back to that evening 2008 in Mannheim. After we had dinner we we started talking about libraries, gaming, the web 2.0, the future a.s.o. And while we where exchanging our experiences the idea was born to do something at the Bibliothekartag 2009 in Erfurt. And so the story went on.

The first idea was to create a little space for the visitors of the Bibliothekartag 2009 conference in Erfurt to try out the Web 2.0 and the world of computer games. We wanted the librarians to try out these new technologies and to discuss their experiences and ideas. From our point of view most of the librarians in germany did and still do not have much experience with gaming and the web 2.0. This is by the way not only a problem in libraries. You can find the same situation in institutions like museums, operas, universities and even private enterprises. And this is probably comparable to most of the countries worldwide. We started to present our idea to librarians, companies and institutions and we were happy to see that we got a lot of support. Companies like Electronic Arts, libraries like the ETH-library in Zürich, universities like the University of Applied Science in Potsdam and last but not least a huge number of librarians helped us. The result was a bit different to the first idea but in positive way.

We had our own exhibition stand where we introduced our visitors to the world of opportunities and possibilities arising from the use of computer games and Web 2.0 applications. Everybody was invited to try out the aspects and possibilities of new media, computer games and diverse web tools and to gain a better idea of the vast potential of these devices for the development of their libraries. Our visitors had also an opportunity to learn from best-practice models so far in use in libraries worldwide, where Web 2.0 applications were enhancing their services to their customers. The librarians could also experience the chances of including computer games, internet communities and social media into their services and of course we shared our enthusiasm with all the visitors at our exhibition stand. We had speeches and a very successful panel discussion with librarians, game-developers and futurologists about the future of libraries. To get an little insight about Erfurt 2009 we created a little trailer. Enjoy yourself :-)

After one year successful voluntary working together we found ourselves again at the celebration-dinner of a Bibliothekartag. And while we where celebrating our success we where asked to go on with our work. Today we have an legal form that goes with our activities. We started a research programme and we are teaching librarians how to use the Web 2.0 and computer games as part of their daily work. At www.zukunftswerkstatt.mixxt.org you can find our interdisciplinary online-community which is open for everyone who wants to think about the question how we will impart cultural and scientific content in the future. We are also talking to companies and politicians to make them understand how important it is to support the libraries on their way in the future. Beside this we started to found an own research-institute. Furthermore we are realizing a roadshow which is a mobile-future-library. But the most important thing is we are activating people to try out these new technologies.

In 2010 the library-conference was located in Leipzig. Prof. Dr. Hans-Christoph Hobohm from the University of Applied Science in Potsdam who had been with us from the first activities in Erfurt 2009 told us that there was the possibillity for the Zukunftswerkstatt to present Michael as speaker at the library-conference in Leipzig. It was the Embassy of the United States that made this possible. Prof. Dr. Hobohm also  had an great idea. As mentioned before we found a legal form for the Zukunftswerkstatt that goes with our activities and structure. Our legal form is an registered non-profit association. We wanted to found it officially during the libraryconference in Leipzig. In Germany you need 7 people to found such an association. Generally who can ask everyone to become a founder. But we wanted to have founders that identify to our project and our activities and that will support us. Prof. Dr. Hobohm asked Michael to become the 7th founder. Michael accept our invitation and so he became and he still is a founder of the Zukunftswerkstatt Kultur- und Wissensvermittlung e.V.

From left to right: Jin Tan (Zukunftswerkstatt), Christoph Deeg (Zukunftswerkstatt), Dr. Rudolf Mumenthaler (ETH Zürich) , Julia Bergmann (Zukunftswerkstatt), Michael Stephens, Prof. Dr. Hans-Christoph Hobohm (University of applied science Potsdam) und Hans-Jürgen Schmid (librarian emeritus)

We are very happy that we were able to gain Michael Stephens as a founder of our association. During the day that we spent with him in Berlin we were able to learn a lot. Sharing and discussing ideas and visions is important. It was fascinating to find out the similarities and the differences between our two cultures. But we also found out that we had much more similarities than expected. We believe that the future of libraries is not based on countries or areas. Everyone can learn from each other. Our little association has founders in the USA, China, Germany and Switzerland.

We would like to invite you to become part of our interdisciplinary and international community. Talk to us! Talk about us! Lets have fun…

Christoph Deeg

http://www.zukunftswerkstatt.org/

by Michael at August 26, 2010 05:12 PM

LISWire

LISWire: EBSCO Publishing Extends Text-to-Speech Feature to All EBSCOhost® Databases

~New EBSCOhost ®Feature Supports Reading & Comprehension Benefitting School and Public Library Databases ~

IPSWICH, Mass. —August 26, 2010 — EBSCO Publishing (EBSCO) has added text-to-speech (read aloud) support to EBSCOhost® databases, including its major school and public library databases, by embedding Texthelp Systems’ SpeechStream toolbar—a valuable benefit provided at no additional cost to the user. Users will be able to take advantage of this new feature with any full-text articles available in HTML.

Text-to-speech support, already featured in EBSCO’s English Language Learner Reference Center™, allows users to read along while a human-sounding voice speaks the text on the screen. The support toolbar provides significant assistance to those for whom text-to-speech capabilities are highly valued such as English Language Learners, users with low vision, slight physical and/or learning disabilities, as well as eBook and PDA users.

Texthelp Systems is the industry leader in literacy and language support technology for online learning. Recent studies have shown that students using Texthelp’s literacy support tools demonstrated significant improvements in both reading comprehension and writing performance. The President of Texthelp Systems, Jack Dolan, says SpeechStream delivers high quality reading support via the Web to improve access to information. “With the ever increasing demand to provide all users access to electronic resources when and where they need them, our partnership with EBSCO allows us to deliver the literacy support tools these users require.”

Utilizing the text-to-speech feature via the EBSCOhost platform provides many advantages. Users have the ability to read-aloud by selected text, sentence, paragraph, or continuous reading with dual color synchronous highlighting (highlighting of the passage being read with a second color highlighting the specific word being read aloud at that moment). User control of read-aloud personalizes the learning experience for each user. Users can control reading speed as well as select between three different high-quality voices—American, British, or Australian. These options also enable teachers and professionals to incorporate the features as a tool for teaching English and reading.

About EBSCO Publishing
EBSCO Publishing is the world’s premier database aggregator, offering a suite of nearly 300 full-text and secondary research databases. Through a library of tens of thousands of full-text journals, magazines, books, monographs, reports and various other publication types from renowned publishers, EBSCO serves the content needs of all researchers (Academic, Medical, K-12, Public Library, Corporate, Government, etc.). The company’s product lines include proprietary databases such as Academic Search™, Business Source®, CINAHL®, DynaMed™, Literary Reference Center™, MasterFILE™, NoveList®, SocINDEX™ and SPORTDiscus™ as well as dozens of leading licensed databases such as ATLA Religion Database™, EconLit, INSPEC®, MEDLINE®, MLA International Bibliography, The Philosopher’s Index™, PsycARTICLES® and PsycINFO®. Databases are powered by EBSCOhost®, the most-used for-fee electronic resource in libraries around the world. EBSCO is the provider of EBSCO Discovery Service™ a core collection of locally-indexed metadata creating a unified index of an institution’s resources within a single, customizable search point providing everything the researcher needs in one place—fast, simple access to the library’s full text content, deeper indexing and more full-text searching of more journals and magazines than any other discovery service (www.ebscohost.com/discovery). For more information, visit the EBSCO Publishing Web site at: www.ebscohost.com, or contact: information@ebscohost.com. EBSCO Publishing is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., one of the largest privately held companies in the United States.

About Texthelp Systems Inc.
Texthelp Systems (http://www.texthelp.com) provides literacy software solutions for individuals, K-12 schools, higher education institutions, and publishers. The company’s mission is to provide high quality and innovative technology for persons of any age seeking to develop their literacy skills through the use of a computer. Texthelp’s products include: Read&Write GOLD, Fluency Tutor, Lexiflow, and SpeechStream. Read&Write GOLD is a customizable easy to use toolbar that seamlessly integrates with mainstream applications allowing students to access reading, writing, studying, and research support tools from within software programs they use everyday. Fluency Tutor is an online solution for developing and measuring oral reading fluency. Lexiflow and SpeechStream allow publishers to deliver digital talking ebooks, assessments, and online content with the support tools students need.
###

For more information, please contact:
Kathleen McEvoy
Public Relations Manager
EBSCO Publishing
(800) 653-2726 ext. 2594
kmcevoy@ebscohost.com

Christina Nawn
Marketing Communications Manager
Texthelp Systems
(888)-248-0652
c.nawn@texthelp.com

August 26, 2010 03:44 PM

Stephen Abram

Do you have to organize global meetings or webinars?

Do you have to organize global meetings or webinars? I often participate or organze these and it’s a pain to get the time zones right and find the best tie so everyone can attend. I will admit that I’ve chaired North American meetings from Australia at 3 a.m. so I am thrilled to find this little tool via Coudal Partners:

Every Time Zone

Cool.

Stephen

by admin at August 26, 2010 12:35 PM

O'Reilly Radar

Earthquakes are HUGE on Data.gov

Strata 2011After launching just over a year ago with only 47 data sets, the "Raw Data Catalog" catalog on Data.gov

now has 2,326 entries that have been collectively downloaded almost three-quarters of a million times. Of course, even these sizable download counts understate the actual impact of this data, which is being embedded in a variety of sites and apps, like those being developed for the Health 2.0 Developer Challenge.


The big Data.gov winner so far? The Department of the Interior's "Worldwide M1+ Earthquakes, Past 7 Days" data set. My guess is that there is some great app or visualization out there making daily use of this file -- if you know what it it is, report it in the comments.



Update: In the comments, Mike suggested that earthquake downloads could be driven by a recurring visualization in the Popular Mechanics iPad App. I tracked down the app's developer, Jonathan Cousins, and he confirmed that "the app grabs data about the most recent seismic activity from USGS feeds via wifi or 3G. " Not quite sure of the mechanics of how this is being tallied on Data.gov, but it's a really great example of how someone is using this data to create new value.


The top 10 data sets by download count are:

  1. Worldwide M1+ Earthquakes, Past 7 Days. 122,888 downloads. Real-time, worldwide earthquake list for the past 7 days. Department of the Interior.
  2. Latest Volumes of Foreign Relations of the United States. 10,090 downloads. The feed for the latest ten volumes of the official historical documentary record of U.S. foreign policy in the Foreign Relations of the United States series. Department of State.
  3. U.S. Overseas Loans and Grants (Greenbook). 6,670 downloads. These data are U.S Economic and Military Assistance by country from 1946 to the present. US Agency for International Development.

  4. Interested in making sense of your data, or teaching others how? The O'Reilly Stata Conference: The Business of Data, is happening 1-3 February, 2011, in Santa Clara, CA.


  5. Child-Related Product Recalls. 2,784 downloads. Lists recalls from CPSC, the agency charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of serious injury or death from thousands of types of consumer products. US Consumer Product Safety Commission.
  6. Airline On-Time Performance and Causes of Flight Delays. 2,716 downloads. On-time arrival data for non-stop domestic flights by major air carriers, as well as additional items, such as departure and arrival delays, origin and destination airports, flight numbers, scheduled and actual departure and arrival times, cancelled or diverted flights, taxi-out and taxi-in times, air time, and non-stop distance. Department of Transportation.
  7. 2005 Toxics Release Inventory data for American Samoa. 2,628 downloads. The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a publicly available EPA database that contains information on toxic chemical releases and waste management activities reported annually by certain industries as well as federal facilities. Environmental Protection Agency.
  8. OSHA Data Initiative - Establishment Specific Injury and Illness Rates. 2,588 downloads. The data used by OSHA to calculate establishment-specific injury and illness incidence rates. Department of Labor.
  9. 2001 Federal Register in XML. 2,506 downloads. The official daily publication for rules, proposed rules, and notices of Federal agencies and organizations, as well as executive orders and other presidential documents. National Archives and Records Administration.
  10. 2007 National RCRA Hazardous Waste Biennial Report Data Files. 2,266 downloads. Data on the generation of hazardous waste from large-quantity generators and on waste management practices from treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. Environmental Protection Agency.
  11. Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) Files, All Data, 2005 2,000 Downloads. Data on the use of energy in residential housing units including physical housing unit types, appliances utilized, demographics, fuels, and other energy-use information from the Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS), which is conducted every four years. Department of Energy.

Here's a breakdown of the contributions by agency:

AgencyData sets contributedDownloads
Environmental Protection Agency474160,716
Department of Defense

21444,837 Department of the Interior197157,273 Department of Commerce17637,430 Department of Health and Human Services14443,697 Executive Office of the President1327,569 Department of the Treasury9349,859 Department of Justice9016,392 Department of Energy8612,965 All remaining agencies740209,872

Finally, here's a link to the data.gov catalog that includes the number of times the set has been downloaded. (If you're interested in how this was done, check out Use BeautifulSoup to parse data.gov over on O'Reilly Answers).

Congrats to everyone at data.gov for creating this incredible resource for developers-at-large.

by Andrew Odewahn at August 26, 2010 12:30 PM

Stephen Abram

The Future of Public Relations and Social Media

Obviously, more than library sector is undergoing dynamic change, I thin that there is some overlap between the changes in marketing organizations and libraries and found this article interesting to read:

The Future of Public Relations and Social Media

Here are the headings:
The Future of the Press Release
The Evolution of Social Platforms
Current Limitations & Solutions
Connecting with Other PR Pros
Saving Money and Putting It to Good Use
The Human Factor

Those headings could apply to any article for most any industry or sector.

Either way, it seems that we’re all struggling in keeping the human touch while taking advantage of the opportunities provided by the new tools.

Stephen

by admin at August 26, 2010 11:53 AM

Google

Google Realtime Search: a new home with new tools

When we first introduced our real-time search features last December, we focused on bringing relevance to the freshest information on the web. Our goal was to provide real-time content from a comprehensive set of sources, integrated right into your usual search results. Today we’re making our most significant enhancements to date, giving real-time information its own home and more powerful tools to help you find what you need. Now you can access Google Realtime Search at its own address, www.google.com/realtime (the page is rolling out now and should be available soon. Use this link if you want to try out the new features right away).

On the new homepage you’ll find some great tools to help you refine and understand your results. First, you can use geographic refinements to find updates and news near you, or in a region you specify. So if you’re traveling to Los Angeles this summer, you can check out tweets from Angelenos to get ideas for activities happening right where you are.

In addition, we’ve added a conversations view, making it easy to follow a discussion on the real-time web. Often a single tweet sparks a larger conversation of re-tweets and other replies, but to put it together you have to click through a bunch of links and figure it out yourself. With the new “full conversation” feature, you can browse the entire conversation in a single glance. We organize the tweets from oldest to newest and indent so you quickly see how the conversation developed.

Finally, we’ve also added updates content to Google Alerts, making it easy to stay informed about a topic of your choosing. Now you can create an alert specifically for “updates” to get an email the moment your topic appears on Twitter or other short-form services. Or, if you want to manage your email volume, you can set alerts to email you once per day or week.

Check out our demo video of the new features and quick tips on how to use them:



You can access Realtime Search by typing www.google.com/realtime directly into your browser, or clicking the “Updates” link in the left-hand panel of your search results. Set up your Google Alerts at www.google.com/alerts. Realtime Search and updates in Google Alerts are available globally in 40 languages, and the geographic refinements and conversations views are available in English, Japanese, Russian and Spanish. The features are rolling out now, but you can use this link to see them right away.

by A Googler (noreply@blogger.com) at August 26, 2010 11:59 AM

O'Reilly Radar

Four short links: 26 August 2010

  1. Germany's Industrial Expansion Fueled by Absence of Copyright Law? (Der Spiegel) -- fascinating article about the extraordinary publishing output in 1800s Germany vs other nations, all with no effective and enforceable copyright laws. Sigismund Hermbstädt, for example, a chemistry and pharmacy professor in Berlin, who has long since disappeared into the oblivion of history, earned more royalties for his "Principles of Leather Tanning" published in 1806 than British author Mary Shelley did for her horror novel "Frankenstein," which is still famous today. Books were released in high-quality high-price format and low-quality low-price format, and Germans bought them in record numbers. When copyright law became established, publishers did away with the low-quality low-price version and authors complained about the drop in revenue.
  2. Cheap Ebooks Give Second Life to Backlist -- it can't be said enough that dead material in print can have a second life online. Here are numbers to make the story plain. (via Hacker News)
  3. Competing Hypotheses -- a free, open source tool for complex research problems. A software companion to a 30+ year-old CIA research methodology, Open Source Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) will help you think objectively and logically about overwhelming amounts of data and hypotheses. It can also guide research teams toward more productive discussions by identifying the exact points of contention. (via johnmscott on Twitter)
  4. Economics of Scholarly Production: Supplemental Materials -- scholarly publications include data and documentation that's not in the official peer-reviewed article. Storing and distributing this has been the publication's responsibility, but they're spitting the dummy. Now the researcher's organisation will have to house these supplemental materials. If data is as critical to science as the article it generates, yet small articles can come from terabytes of data, what's the Right Thing To Do that scales across all academia? (via Cameron Neylon)

by Nat Torkington at August 26, 2010 10:00 AM

Karen Coombs

Lessons in Creating open source software

Ed Corrado has a nice post entitled “Little Things Matter” on some key things that open source software creators should keep in mind. I agree with the spirit of what Ed says wholeheartedly.

I can’t tell you how many times when I was an open source noob, I’d wonder what the heck the installation instructions were talking about or was frustrated because no one answered questions posted to the listserv. I suppose that is one of the reasons I thought “when I write a book on open source web applications that it will contain specific installation instructions”. Having written that book now, its not as easy as it might seem. I mean do I give step by step instruction on MySQL using the command line or MyPHPAdmin? Instruction for what OS? It is daunting for both people writing documentation and those using it.

Which bring us to the point that Kathryn Greenhill makes in comment on a post by Roy Tennant which highlights the Ed’s commentary. Open source software means that users need to take an more active role than often people are used to taking. More than once at the end of a frustrating day working to get something installed properly, I’ve gone back in and edited software’s documentation wiki or sent an email with suggested changes. Better and more thorough documentation almost always comes from a community effort.

To do this though one has to learn how to participate in an open source community. Learning how to participate is a ongoing process though because one may participate in new ways or in different communities over time. The idea though is that community members are able to build confidence over time by acquiring new skills. Case in point, there is a patch for a Drupal module I’d like to test, try and report back on. But I’ve never done that before. So I don’t know how to apply the patch, which means I’m sort of stuck until I either:

  1. Go searching the internet for instructions
  2. Ask someone who I know might how to do it to help me

At the moment I’m not feeling brave enough to deal with the situation. I’m nervous about the possibility of seriously messing up my test server and having to rebuild it, but I’m also afraid of looking stupid because I have to admit that I’m outside my comfort zone.

Many of the things that Ed suggest in his post help to build a larger comfortable starting point for users trying to implement open source software and participate in the community. Without that it sort of feels like you’re hanging on by your finger nails trying to do this stuff and it makes you not want to try. Everyone needs a starting point and if you’re creating open source software you have to think about starting point you are giving people to be part of your software’s community.

by Karen at August 26, 2010 02:04 AM

Kathryn Greenhill

Yes, Google phone calls to the US for free works in Australia

This morning, along with a lot of people in Australia, my gmail account came with a new feature, offering to let me make free phone calls to the US and Canada.

“Huh”, I thought, “dumb google marketers presume we are all in the US and Canada and have just added the notice to *everyone’s* account – bet it doesn’t work”…

BUT….

I opened the window, started entering a friend’s phone number – only to have it finished from my contacts lists – and bingo! – connected for free to a phone number in the US. The line (channel ?) quality was fine and the connection was fast with no dropouts. And it didn’t cost me a cent.

How quickly my thinking has changed. I didn’t think “gee, this is just like calling from my phone”, but “hey, just like Skype”…

Wonder how long before – if ever – I will be able to call within Australia for free. Right now it costs 2c per minute if I use this service … actually not too bad … And definitely what I would use when travelling overseas,  if for some reason Skype does not let me call home.

by Kathryn Greenhill at August 26, 2010 01:34 AM

Dan Scott

Non-stop Evergreen, or "What I'm doing on my summer vacation"

Last week, I started my summer vacation with a weekend at a friend's cottage. By Tuesday I was deeply engrossed in some Evergreen enhancement work for the International Institute of Social History. I'm building an authorities management user interface that properly exposes Evergreen's powerful authority support in the 2.0 release: browsing authority lists, editing authorities and having the updates ripple through to the bibliographic records with controlled fields, merging and deleting authorities... here's a screenshot of the interface in progress: . The numbers represent the number of bibliographic records linked to each authority record. These are still early days, but I think there are some cataloguers that are going to be pretty excited about this functionality when they get their hands on it.

This week, I'm on location in the Robertson Library at the University of Prince Edward Island doing some Evergreen consulting work for them. The good people at UPEI have put my family and I up in a nice cottage on the island, so I'm toiling away at improving Evergreen during the day while my family explores the island. Melissa Belvadi and Grant Johnson have put together a list of pain points that they would like me to address that happen to mesh nicely with general pain points that have come up over the years on the Evergreen mailing lists. My first priority has been to make working with spine labels a little less aggravating. I'm happy to say that after a day and a half, I've been able to teach the spine label editor how to (*gasp*) move up and down with the arrow keys and (*ooh-ahh*) insert and delete new lines and (*w00t*) have the spine label defaults come from library settings that only have to be set once instead of being individually set by each cataloguer. Oh, and I've added font size, font weight, and font family to those settings so that you can have 20 pt. bold Helvetica spine labels if you want them.

All of this code is being committed to Evergreen trunk as I hit functionality milestones; much of the authority work has made its way into the Evergreen 2.0 alpha release that was cut on Monday (although not yet announced officially). On Monday I also cut the OpenSRF 1.6.0-alpha release and uploaded a virtual image built on Debian Squeeze reflecting the OpenSRF/Evergreen alpha releases to http://evergreen-ils.org/~denials/Evergreen_trunk_2010_08_23.zip (note that it's 500 MB, and does not come with X installed, so it's primarily aimed at users that are already familiar with Evergreen and just want to see the new stuff without having to go through the entire install process).

I did take some time off of Evergreen development this afternoon, as I was honoured to be one of the two guests on the FLOSS Weekly podcast. Mike Rylander and I were there to discuss Evergreen with the hosts, Randal Schwartz and Dan Lynch. Unfortunately for Mike, me, and the audience, Mike's Skype connection kept dropping and I had to do the bulk of the talking. Despite missing the contributions from Mike's massive brain, I'm told that the show went well. So if you're interested in hearing a bit about Evergreen and why I do what I do, keep an eye open for the interview at http://twit.tv/floss132 - it should be edited and online by Friday, August 27th at the latest. I tried not to swear too often so they wouldn't have to do much editing work - heh.

Finally, somewhere in there I celebrated another birthday. Oh yeah! Older? Yes! Wiser? Probably not.

by dan@coffeecode.net (Dan Scott) at August 26, 2010 12:40 AM

August 25, 2010

LITA

LITA Forum Student Registration Rate Available

LITA is offering a special student registration rate to the 2010 LITA National Forum to a limited number of graduate students enrolled in ALA accredited programs. The Forum will be held September 30 – October 3, 2010 at the Hilton City Downtown, Atlanta, GA. To learn more about the Forum, visit www.lita.org/forum

In exchange for the discounted registration, students will assist the LITA organizers and the Forum presenters with the on-site operations for the Forum. This year’s theme is “The Cloud & the Crowd.” We are anticipating an attendance of 400-500 decision makers and implementers of new information technologies in libraries.

The selected students will be expected to attend the full LITA National Forum, Friday noon through Sunday noon, but not the preconferences on Thursday and Friday. You will be assigned a variety of duties, but will be able to attend the Forum programs, which include 3 keynote sessions, approximately 30 concurrent sessions, and 12 poster presentations.

The student rate is $175 – half the regular registration rate for LITA members. This rate includes a Friday night reception at the hotel, continental breakfasts, and Saturday lunch.

To apply for the student registration rate, please provide the following information:

1) Complete contact information including email address,
2) The name of the school you are attending, and
3) 150 word (or less) statement on why you want to attend the LITA National Forum

Please send this information no later than September 10, 2010 to lita@ala.org, with LITA Forum Student Registration Request in the subject line.

Those selected for the student rate will be notified no later than September 15, 2010.

by Melissa Prentice at August 25, 2010 09:51 PM

O'Reilly Radar

The Big Picture: What are we making in school?

Elliot Washor of Big Picture Learning organized an educational symposium during Maker Faire Detroit. The symposium brought together educators and practitioners who explored engaging the hands and minds of students, sometimes called thinkering. As a group, they experienced Maker Faire and then met to discuss "how making can be an integral part of how young people figure out who they are in the world." This is a really key idea, I think: what we can learn by making is a process of discovering what we can do, and we begin to participate in making and changing the world around us.

Elliot has shared his thoughts in a Huffington Post article, Making Their Way: Creating a New Generation of Thinkerers. Here is an excerpt:

Making provides opportunities for young people to use their hands and their minds together. Untold numbers of youth are messing around with all manner of tools to create, in tangible form, what's on their minds. Equally important, the maker movement nurtures communities of practice that bring adults and young people together around common interests. Thus, to visit the Maker Faire or a community-based fab lab is to see an aspect of our young people that we seldom witness in schools.

Sadly, however, to observe these young "thinkerers" is to be at least temporarily deluded into believing that this is what many of our young people are all about. Not so. Unfortunately, most young people do not experience making in their schools or in their lives. Literally and figuratively, most of our young people are not at the Faire. Research reveals that the vast majority of them are not into making at all and instead are frittering away their time in a variety of wasteful and unproductive learning activities.

Making is a celebration of an alternative and powerful way of knowing and of thinking things through. Consequently, making is typically antithetical to what traditional schools are all about. That is why the communities of practice that come together at Maker Faires and fabrication labs usually--some would say thankfully--flourish outside of schools.

A few educators, however, are circling these making places to determine where and how they fit in schools, if at all. Educational historian Larry Cremin once wryly noted, that educators respond to a new area of learning by creating a course in it. Recall how schools responded to technology by creating a course "down the hall at fifth period" without ever thinking about changing every course because technology existed. Similarly, educators run the risk of demeaning hand and mind work by creating separate courses for making rather than bringing making into all aspects of the school curriculum and thereby thoroughly reconstituting it.

Recently I learned about a East Bay School for Boys, which is opening this Fall. Incoming sixth graders begin by building their own desk, which according to a consulting teacher David Clifford, gets them involved in creating their own learning environment. In a video on the EBSfB site, one of the organizers of the school said that students can learn through "Play, Practice and Production." That's a really nice framing of how we naturally learn to do things, whether we're talking about soccer, music or robotics.

Will schools find ways to integrate making into the educational experience of students or will students continue to have to look for this experience outside of school -- seeking patchwork alternatives in the community or at home?

by Dale Dougherty at August 25, 2010 09:18 PM

Jason Griffey

eBooks, filetype, and DRM

This morning I got a tweet from Bobbi Newman that said:

librarianbyday

Can someone explain to me the tech reasons Kindle doesn’t work with library ebooks, know its DRM, want more specific plz & thnx @griffey

More than you ever wanted to know about filetypes, DRM, and eBooks…here we go.

There are two different things going on when someone tries to open an eBook file on an eReader. One is filetype…how the file itself is organized internally, how the information contained within is encoded. This is analogous to the difference between a Word file saved as a .doc file, a Word file saved as a .docx file, and an Powerpoint file (.ppt). All are different filetypes…the program involved in the creation, editing, and display of those files describes the information contained inside. Right now, there are two main filetypes being used to describe eBook files: the Amazon eBook standard, or .amz file, and the ePub file (.epub) that is used by just about every other eBook vendor.

Amazon  purchased Mobipocket (an early ebook vendor/distributor) way back in 2005, and used their format as the basis for their current proprietary .amz filetype. ePub, on the other hand, is an open, XML based eBook standard, and is used by a huge number of eBook vendors…indeed, it’s easily the standard for current ebook publishing.

But filetype is only half the battle. In addition to the way the file is organized/structured internally, there is also Digital Rights Management to deal with. Think of DRM on an eBook as a lock, with your eReader having the key to open the lock and display the file. Without the lock, the eReader can’t open the file at all…can’t even see what it is. And if it has the key, but can’t read the filetype, that’s no good either…in that case, you can view the contents of the file, but will have no idea how to render it on the screen properly.

Amazon, in addition to using a proprietary filetype, also uses a proprietary DRM mechanism. This means in order to read an Amazon-purchased eBook, you have to have an eReader with the right key, as well as the right interpreter for the file. So far, that means that you have to be using a Kindle, or alternatively, using the Kindle software provided for any number of other devices (Windows, Mac, iOS devices, Android devices). This doesn’t mean that’s the way it has to be. Amazon could choose, tomorrow, to remove all DRM from their files. This would mean that you’d still need a program to interpret the .amz, but you wouldn’t need the key anymore. Conversely, Amazon could license their DRM to other eReaders, in effect handing them the key…but it would still be up to the eReader itself to be able to display the .amz file.

Vendors that use the ePub format have chosen different sorts of DRM to lock up their content. Apple and their iBook app use the ePub format, but wrap it up with their Apple-specific Fairplay DRM. This means that while the file itself would be readable by any device that can interpret an .epub file, without that particular key on their keyring, the eReader can’t do anything. Sony, Barnes & Noble, Overdrive, and other eBook vendors have chosen a shared DRM solution. They license their DRM from Adobe, and run Adobe Content servers that provide the keys to epub files that they sell. This means that if an eReader has the key to one of those stores, it has the key to all of them…think of it as a shared master key for any Adobe DRM’d file.

This illustrates why, although both Apple and B&N use epub as their filetype, you can’t buy a book from the B&N store and then move it over to your iBook app on your iPad. Conversely, you can’t buy something on the iBook store, and then move it to your Nook. Same filetype, different lock.

Overdrive, in supporting Adobe DRM’d epub files, work with Sony eReaders as well as the B&N Nook…same filetype, same DRM key to unlock them.

With all that said: any eReader that will read a given filetype will read said filetype if the file doesn’t have any DRM. So if you convert an existing document to an epub using software like Calibre, Sigil, or InDesign, that file will able to be read on a Nook, Sony Reader, AND the Apple iPad/iPhone/iPod Touch. If you have some text and you convert it to, say, a Mobipocket file (.mobi or .pdb) then it would be readable on the Kindle AND the Apple iBooks app…but not on the Nook. For a complete list of eReaders and their corresponding filetypes, there is no better place than Wikipedia’s Comparison of eBook Formats article.

While a DRM free eBook ecosystem would clearly be the best for the consumer (choice of device, free movement of files from device to device, etc), the second best option is an ecosystem where the DRM is ubiquitous and the patron doesn’t even realize it’s there. This was the case with Apple and the early battles for music sales on the ‘net…they had the store and the distribution network (iTunes) as well as the device used to access the content (iPod). All of the content was, originally, DRM’d, but largely no one noticed since it was completely invisible for the average user.

The biggest issue with eReaders and library patrons is that this chain isn’t seamless. The content providers and their DRM servers are huge headaches for the average eReader user. My hope is that publishing goes the same way that music did, we we find both a common filetype and lose the DRM. But it took digital music years and years to get there…so I’m not holding my breath.

I hope that helped, but if it didn’t and you still have specific questions about your situation with eReaders/eBooks, ask away in the comments and I’ll do my best to answer them.

by griffey at August 25, 2010 08:31 PM

Ed Summers

bad xml smells

I’m used to refactoring code smells, but sometimes you can catch a bad whiff in XML too.

Before:

< ?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mets TYPE="urn:library-of-congress:ndnp:mets:encyclopedia:encyclopediaEntry" PROFILE="urn:library-of-congress:mets:profiles:ndnp:encyclopediaEntry:v1.1" LABEL="The National Forum Scope Note" 
     xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/METS/" xmlns:dsig="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
 
     <!--METS HEADER-->
     <metshdr CREATEDATE="2007-01-10T09:00:00" ><!--CREATEDATE should be populated with creation date of the record.  RECORDSTATUS should only be set by Validation Application.-->
        <agent ROLE="CREATOR" TYPE="ORGANIZATION">
            <name><!--Awardee, if the awardee created the METS record.  If LC created the METS record, should be "Library of Congress"-->Library of Congress</name>
        </agent>
    </metshdr>
 
    <!--Descriptive metadata for encyclopedia entry-->
    <dmdsec ID="encyclopediaMods">                
        <mdwrap MDTYPE="MODS" LABEL="Encyclopedia entry metadata">
            <xmldata>
                <mods:mods>
                    <mods:name type="corporate">
                            <mods:displayform><!--Awardee-->Library of Congress</mods:displayform>
                    </mods:name>
                    <mods:relateditem>
                        <mods:identifier type="lccn"><!--LCCN-->sn82015056</mods:identifier>
                        <!-- mods:identifier elements are repeatable -->
                    </mods:relateditem>
                </mods:mods>
            </xmldata>
        </mdwrap>
    </dmdsec>
 
 
 
    <!--FILE SECTION-->
    <filesec>
        <filegrp>
            <file ID="encyclopediaEntryText">
                <fcontent>
                    <xmldata>
                        <xhtml:html xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"  lang="en">
                           <xhtml:head>
                              <xhtml:title><!--Newspaper title-->The National Forum (Washington, DC), 1910-19??</xhtml:title>
                           </xhtml:head>
 
                           <xhtml:body>
                              <xhtml:p>
The first issue of the <xhtml:cite>National Forum</xhtml:cite> was likely released on April 30, 1910 
and the newspaper ran through at least November 12 of that year. The four-page African-American 
weekly covered such local events as Howard University graduations and Baptist church activities, but its 
pages also included national news, sports, home maintenance, women's news, science, editorial 
cartoons, and reprinted stories from national newspapers. Its primary focus was on how the news 
affected the city's black community. A unique feature was its coverage of Elks Club meetings and 
activities.  Business manager John H. Wills contributed the community-centered "Vanity Fair" column that
 usually appeared on the front page of each issue. The publisher and editor was Ralph W. White, who 
went on to publish another African-American newspaper, the <xhtml:a href="info:lccn/sn86092050">
<xhtml:cite>McDowell Times</xhtml:cite></xhtml:a> of Keystone, West Virginia. Originally located at 
609 F St., NW, the newspaper's offices moved in August to 1022 U Street, N.W. to be closer to the 
African-American community it served.  No extant first issue of the <xhtml:cite>National
 Forum</xhtml:cite> exists.
                              </xhtml:p>
                           </xhtml:body>
                        </xhtml:html>
                    </xmldata>
                </fcontent>
            </file>
        </filegrp>
    </filesec>
 
    <!--STRUCTURAL MAP-->    
    <structmap xmlns:np="urn:library-of-congress:ndnp:mets:newspaper">
        <div TYPE="np:encyclopediaEntry" DMDID="encyclopediaMods">
            <fptr FILEID="encyclopediaEntryText"/>
        </div>
    </structmap>    
</mets>

After:

< ?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
< !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
  <head>
    <title>The National Forum (Washington, DC), 1910-19??</title>
    <meta content="The National Forum (Washington, DC), 1910-19??" property="dcterms:title"/>
    <meta content="2007-01-10T09:00:00" property="dcterms:created"/>
    <meta content="Library of Congress" property="dcterms:creator"/>
    <meta content="http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015056#title" property="dcterms:subject"/>
  </head>
  <body rel="dcterms:description">
    <p>The first issue of the <cite>National Forum</cite> was likely released on April 30, 1910 and the 
newspaper ran through at least November 12 of that year. The four-page African-American weekly 
covered such local events as Howard University graduations and Baptist church activities, but its pages 
also included national news, sports, home maintenance, women's news, science, editorial cartoons, and 
reprinted stories from national newspapers. Its primary focus was on how the news affected the city's black community. A unique feature was its coverage of Elks Club meetings and activities.  Business 
manager John H. Wills contributed the community-centered "Vanity Fair" column that usually appeared 
on the front page of each issue. The publisher and editor was Ralph W. White, who went on to publish 
another African-American newspaper, the <a href="http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn86092050">
<cite>McDowell Times</cite></a> of Keystone, West Virginia. Originally located at 609 F St., NW, the 
newspaper's offices moved in August to 1022 U Street, N.W. to be closer to the African-American 
community it served.  No extant first issue of the <cite>National Forum</cite> exists.</p>
  </body>
</html>

I basically took a complicated METS wrapper around some XHTML, which was really just expressing metadata about the HTML, and refactored it as XHTML. Not that METS is a bad XML smell generally, but in this particular case it was overkill. If you look closely you’ll see I’m using RDFa, similar to what Facebook are doing with their OpenGraph Protocol. There’s less to get wrong, what’s there should look more familiar to web developers who aren’t versed in arcane library standards, and I can now read the metadata from the XHTML with an RDFa aware parser, like Python’s rdflib:

>>> import rdflib
>>> g = rdflib.Graph()
>>> g.parse('essays/1.html', format='rdfa')
>>> for triple in g: print triple
... 
(rdflib.term.URIRef('file:///home/ed/Projects/essays/essays/1.html'), rdflib.term.URIRef('http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator'), rdflib.term.Literal(u'Library of Congress'))
(rdflib.term.URIRef('file:///home/ed/Projects/essays/essays/1.html'), rdflib.term.URIRef('http://purl.org/dc/terms/title'), rdflib.term.Literal(u'The National Forum (Washington, DC), 1910-19??'))
(rdflib.term.URIRef('file:///home/ed/Projects/essays/essays/1.html'), rdflib.term.URIRef('http://purl.org/dc/terms/description'), rdflib.term.Literal(u'\n    <p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">\nThe first issue of the <cite>National Forum</cite> was likely released on April 30, 1910 and the newspaper ran through at least November 12 of that year. The four-page African-American weekly covered such local events as Howard University graduations and Baptist church activities, but its pages also included national news, sports, home maintenance, women\'s news, science, editorial cartoons, and reprinted stories from national newspapers. Its primary focus was on how the news affected the city\'s black community. A unique feature was its coverage of Elks Club meetings and activities.  Business manager John H. Wills contributed the community-centered &quot;Vanity Fair&quot; column that usually appeared on the front page of each issue. The publisher and editor was Ralph W. White, who went on to publish another African-American newspaper, the <a href="http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn86092050"><cite>McDowell Times</cite></a> of Keystone, West Virginia. Originally located at 609 F St., NW, the newspaper\'s offices moved in August to 1022 U Street, N.W. to be closer to the African-American community it served.  No extant first issue of the <cite>National Forum</cite> exists.\n</p>\n  ', datatype=rdflib.term.URIRef('http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral')))
(rdflib.term.URIRef('file:///home/ed/Projects/essays/essays/1.html'), rdflib.term.URIRef('http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject'), rdflib.term.Literal(u'http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82015056#title'))
(rdflib.term.URIRef('file:///home/ed/Projects/essays/essays/1.html'), rdflib.term.URIRef('http://purl.org/dc/terms/created'), rdflib.term.Literal(u'2007-01-10T09:00:00'))

by ed at August 25, 2010 07:16 PM

O'Reilly Radar

Tracking the signal of emerging technologies

4727644780_1a2f2e5f04_b.jpgLast week the words of science fiction writer William Gibson ran rampant over the Twitter back channel at the inaugural NASA IT Summit when a speaker quoted his observation that "The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet." That's a familiar idea to readers of the O'Reilly Radar, given its focus on picking up the weak signals that provide insight into what's coming next. So what does the future of technology hold for humanity and space flight? I've been reading the fiction of Jules Verne, Isaac Asimov, David Brin, Neal Stephenson, Bruce Sterling and many other great authors since I was a boy, and thinking and dreaming of what's to come. I'm not alone in that; Tim O'Reilly is also dreaming of augmented reality fiction these days.

Last week I interviewed NASA's CIO and CTO at the NASA IT Summit about some of that fiction made real. We discussed open source, cloud computing, virtualization, and Climate@Home, a distributed supercomputer for climate modeling. Those all represent substantive, current implementations of enterprise IT that enable the agency to support mission-critical systems. (If you haven't read about the state of space IT, it's worth circling back.)

Three speakers at the Summit offered perspectives on emerging technologies that were compelling enough to report on:

  • Former senior technology officer at the Defense Intelligence Agency Lewis Shepherd
  • Gartner VP David Cearley
  • Father of the Internet Vint Cerf

You can watch Cerf speak in the embedded video below. (As a bonus, Jack Blitch's presentation on Disney's "Imagineers" follows.) For more on the technologies they discuss, and Shepherd's insight into a "revolution in scientific computing," read on.


Building an Internet in space

Even a cursory look at the NASA IT Summit Agenda reveals the breadth of topics discussed. You could find workshops on everything from infrastructure to interactivity, security in the cloud to open government, space medicine to ITIL, as well as social media and virtual worlds. The moment that was clearly a highlight for many attendees, however, came when Vint Cerf talked about the evolution of the Internet. His perspective on building resilient IT systems that last clearly resonated with this crowd, especially his description of the mission as "a term of art." Cerf said that "designing communications and architectures must be from a multi-mission point of view." This has particular relevance for an agency that builds IT systems for space, where maintenance isn't a matter of a stroll to the server room.

Cerf's talk was similar to the one he delivered at "Palantir Night Live" earlier this summer, which you can watch on YouTube or read about from Rob Pegoraro at the Washington Post.

Cerf highlighted the more than 1.8 billion people on the IP network worldwide at the end of 2009, as well as the 4.5 billion mobile devices that are increasingly stressing it. "The growth in the global Internet has almost exhausted IPv4 address space," he said. "And that's my fault." Time for everyone to learn IPv6.

Looking ahead to the future growth of the Internet, Cerf noted both the coming influx of Asian users and the addition of non-Latin characters, including Cyrillic, Chinese, and Arabic. "If your systems are unprepared to deal with non-Latin character sets, you need to correct that deficiency," he said.

Cerf also considered the growth of the "Real World Web" as computers are increasingly embedded in "human space." In the past, humans have adapted to computer interfaces, he said, but computers are increasingly adapting to human interfaces, operating by speech, vision, touch and gestures.

Cerf pointed to the continued development of Google Goggles, an app that allows Android users to take a picture of an object and send it to Google to find out what it is. As CNET reported yesterday, Goggles is headed to iPhones this year. Cerf elicited chuckles from the audience when describing the potential for his wife's Cochlear implant to be reprogrammed with TCP/IP, thereby allowing her to ask questions over a VoIP network, essentially putting her wife on the Internet. To date, as far as we know, she is not online.

Cerf also described the growing "Internet of Things." That network will include an InterPlaNetary Internet, said Cerf, or IPN. Work has been going forward on the IPN since 1998, including the development of more fault-tolerant networking that stores and forwards packets as connections become available in a "variably delayed and disrupted environment."

"TCP/IP is not going to work," he said, "as the distance between planets is literally astronomical. TCP doesn't do well with that. The other problem is celestial motion, with planets rotating. We haven't figured out how to stop that."

The "Bundle Protocol" is the key to an interplanetary Internet, said Cerf. The open source, publicly available Bundle protocol was first tested in space on the UK-DMC satellite in 2008. This method allows three to five times more data throughput than standard TCP/IP, addressing the challenge of packetized communications by hopping and storing the data. Cerf said we'll need more sensors in space, including self-documenting instruments for meta-data and calibration, in order to improve remote networking capabilities. "I'm deeply concerned that we don't know how to do many of these things," he observed.

Cerf also expressed concern about the lack of standards for cloud computing, suggesting that "we need a virtual cloud to allow more interoperability."

Government 2.0 and the Revolution in Scientific Computing

Lewis Shepherd, former senior technology officer at the Defense Intelligence Agency and current Director of Microsoft’s Institute for Advanced Technology in Governments, focused his talk on whether humanity is on the cusp of a fourth research paradigm as the "scale and expansion of storage and computational power continues unabated."

Shepherd put that prediction in the context of the evolution of science from experimental to theoretical to computational. Over time, scientists have moved beyond describing natural phenomena or Newton's Laws to simulating complex phenomena, an ability symbolized by comparing the use of lens-based microscopes to electron microscopes. This has allowed scientists to create nuclear simulations.

Shepherd now sees the emergence of a fourth paradigm, or "eScience," where a set of tools and technologies support data federation and collaboration to address the explosion of exabytes of data. As an example he referenced imagery of the Pleiades star cluster from the Digitized Sky Survey synthesized within the WorldWide Telescope.

"When data becomes ubiquitous, when we become immersed in a sea of data, what are the implications?" asked Shepherd. "We need to be able to derive meaning and information that wasn't predicted when the data sets were constructed. No longer will we have to be constrained by databases that are purpose-built for a system that we design with a certain set of requirements. We can do free-form science against unconstrained sets of data, or modeling on the fly because of the power of the cloud."

His presentation from the event is embedded below.

In particular, Shepherd looked at the growth of cloud computing and data ubiquity as an enabler for collaboration and distributed research worldwide. In the past, the difficulty of replicating scientific experiments was a hindrance. He doesn't see that as a fundamental truth anymore. Another liberating factor, in his view, is the evolution of programming into modeling.

"Many of the new programming tools are not just visual but hyper-visual, with drag and drop modeling. Consider that in the context of continuous networking," he said. "Always-on systems offer you the ability to program against data sets in the cloud, where you can see the emergence of real-time interactive simulations."

What could this allow? "NASA can design systems that appear to be far simpler than the computation going on behind the scenes," he suggested. "This could enable pervasive, accurate, and timely modeling of reality."

Much of this revolution is enabled by open data protocols and open data sets, posited Shepherd, including a growing set of interactions -- government-to-government, government-to-citizen, citizen-to-citizen -- that are leading to the evolution of so-called "citizen science." Shepherd referenced the Be A Martian Project, where the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory crowdsourced images from Mars.

He was less optimistic about the position of the United States in research and development, including basic science. Even with President Obama's promise to put science back in its rightful place during his inaugural address, and some $24 billion dollars in new spending in the Recovery Act, Shepherd placed total research and development as a percentage of GDP at only 0.8%.

"If we don't perform fundamental research and development here, it can be performed elsewhere," said Shepherd. "If we don't productize here, technology will be productized elsewhere. Some areas are more important than others; there are some areas we would not like to see an overseas label on. The creation of NASA itself was based on that. Remember Sputnik?"

His observations paralleled those made by Intel CEO Paul Otelinni at the Aspen Forum this Monday, who sees the U.S. facing a looming tech decline.

"Government has the ability to recognize long time lines," said Shepherd, "and then make long term investment decisions on funding of basic science." The inclusion of Web 2.0 into government, a trend evidenced in the upcoming Gov 2.0 Summit, is crucial for revealing that potential. "We should be thinking of tech tools that would underlay Gov 3.0 or Gov 4.0," he said, "like the simulation of data science and investment in STEM education."

Gartner's Top Strategic Technologies

Every year, Gartner releases its list of the top 10 strategic technologies and trends. Their picks for 2010 included cloud computing, mobile applications (Cearley used the term apptrepreneurship to describe the mobile application economy that is powered by the iTunes and Android marketplaces, a useful coinage I wanted to pass along), flash memory, activity monitoring for security, social computing, pod-based data centers, green IT, client computing, advanced analytics, and virtualization for availability. Important trends all, and choices that have been born out since the analysis was issued last October.

What caught my eye at the NASA IT Summit were other emerging technologies, several of which showed up on Gartner's list of emerging technologies in 2008. Several of these are more likely familiar to fellow fans of science fiction than data center operators, though to be fair I've found that there tends to be considerable cross over between the two.

Context-aware Computing
There's been a lot of hype around the "real-time Web" over the past two years. What's coming next is the so-called "right-time Web," where users can find information or access services when and where they need them. This trend is enabled by the emergence of pervasive connectivity, smartphones, and the cloud.

"It will be collaborative, predictive, real-time, and embedded," said Clearey," adding to everyday human beings' daily processes." He also pointed to projects using Hadoop, the open source implementation of MapReduce that Mike Loukides wrote about in What is Data Science? Context-aware computing that features a thin client, perhaps a tablet, powered by massive stores of data and predictive analytics could change the way we work, live, and play. By 2015-2020 there will be a "much more robust context-delivery architecture," Cearley said. "We'll need a structured way of bring together information, including APIs."

Real World Web
Our experiences in the physical world are increasingly integrated with virtual layers and glyphs, a phenomenon that blogger Chris Brogan described in 2008 in his Secrets of the Annotated World. Cyberspace is disappearing into everyday experience. That unification is enabled by geotagging, QR codes, RFID chips, and sensor networks. There's a good chance many more of us will be shopping with QR codes or making our own maps in real-time soon.

Augmented Reality
Context-aware computing and the Real World Web both relate to the emergence of augmented reality, which has the potential to put names to faces and much more. Augmented reality can "put information in context at the point of interaction," said Cearley, "including emerging wearable and 'glanceable' interfaces. There's a large, long term opportunity. In the long term, there's a 'human augmentation' trend."

Features currently available in most mobile devices, such as GPS, cellphone cameras, and accelerometers, have started to make augmented reality available to cutting edge users. For instance the ARMAR project shows the potential of augmented reality for learning, and Augmented reality without the phone is on its way. For a practical guide to augmented reality, look back to 2008 on Radar. Nokia served up a video last year that shows what AR glasses might offer:

Future User Interfaces
While the success of the iPad has many people thinking about touchscreens, Cearley went far beyond touch, pointing to emerging gestural interfaces like the SixthSense wearable computer at MIT. "Consider the Z-factor," he suggested, "or computing in three dimensions." Cearley pointed out that there's also a lot happening in the development of 3D design tools, and he wouldn't count virtual worlds out, though they're mired "deep in the trough of disillusionment." According to Cearley, the problem with current virtual worlds is that they're "mired in a proprietary model, versus an open, standards-driven approach." For a vision of a "spatial operating system" that's familiar to people who have seen "Minority Report," watch the video of g-speak from oblong below:

Fluid User Interface
This idea focuses on taking the user beyond interacting with information through a touchscreen or gesture-based system and into contextual user interfaces, where an ensemble of technologies allow a human to experience emotionally-aware interactions. "Some are implemented in toys and games now," said Cearley, "with sensors and controls." The model would include interactions across multiple devices, including building out a mind-computer interface. "The environment is the computer." For a glimpse into that future, consider the following video from the H+ Summit at Harvard's Science Center with Heather Knight, social roboticist and founder of marilynmonrobot.com:

.

User Experience Platforms
Cearley contended that user experience design is more important than a user experience platform. While a UXP isn't a market yet, Cearley said that he anticipated news of its emergence later in 2010. For more on the importance and context of user experience, check out UX Week, which is happening as I write this in San Francisco. A conceptual video of "Mag+" is embedded below:

Mag+ from Bonnier on Vimeo.

3D Printing
If you're not following the path of make-offs and DIY indie innovations, 3D printing may be novel. In 2010, the 3D printing revolution is well underway at places like MakerBot industries. In the future, DARPA's programmable matter program could go even further, said Cearley, though there will need to be breakthroughs in materials science. You can watch a MakerBot in action below:

Mobile robotics driving mobile infrastructure
I experienced a vision of this future myself at the NASA IT Summit when I interviewed NASA's CTO using a telerobot. Cearley observed many applications coming for this technology, from mobile video conferencing to applications in healthcare and telemedicine. A video from the University of Louisville shows how that future is developing:

Fabric Computing
Cearley's final emerging technology, fabric computing, is truly straight out of science fiction. Storage and networking could be distributed through a garment or shelter, along with displays or interfaces. A Stanford lecture on "computational textiles" is embedded below:

by Alex Howard at August 25, 2010 06:21 PM

ALA TechSource

New Library Technology Report on Measuring Electronic Resource Use

In the August/September issue of Library Technology Reports (vol. 46; no. 6), Rachel Fleming-May and Jill Grogg cover state of the art of electronic resources use measurement, offering guidance on presenting clear and meaningful measurement in research, assessment, and standards creation.

Topics Covered Include:

  • Assessing Use and Usage
  • Standards, Tools, and Other Products
  • Improving Understanding of Electronic Resources Usage
  • Practitioner Responses on the Collection and Use of Usage Statistics

An excerpt follows.

With the explosion of digital resources over the past two decades, standards, tools, and other products have emerged to normalize statistics and improve protocols for transfer and management of such data. Some of these initiatives and products emerged as librarians and content providers alike worked together to paint a more accurate picture of use and usage, even if only at the most basic level. It was not so long ago that reasonably common definitions for actions such as a “session” or a “download” did not exist. Inconsistencies such as these made comparing the usage statistics available from one vendor against the statistics available from another akin to comparing apples and oranges—meaningful cross-comparison was not possible. Item elements, such as session, search, and download, were inconsistent from vendor to vendor and delivered to the librarian in any number of ways in any number of formats.

In addition to the inconsistencies in definition, delivery method, and format, at issue is the amount of time it takes for librarians to collect, collate, and archive usage statistics, particularly for libraries with large digital collections. Initially, some libraries chose to create homegrown solutions to address this issue, and later, commercial vendors emerged with products such as Scholarly Stats, Serials Solutions' 360 Counter, and modules within integrated library systems (ILS). The addition of a module to an ILS a third-party product that is interoperable with an ILS with an ILS is particularly appealing because the librarian can then merge the ILS cost data with the use data to produce another valuable metric: cost-per-use.

This chapter will be a broad introduction to the types of available standards, tools, and products. It is impossible to delve too deeply into the specifics of the standards and protocols as well as compare and contrast the effectiveness of each commercial or homegrown product. For greater analysis and technical information, visit the sites and articles in the end of chapter notes. From Chapter 2 "Standards, Tools, and Other Products"

Rachel A. Fleming-May is an assistant professor at the School of Information Sciences at the University of Tennessee. She received her PhD from the University of Alabama in 2008, and she has published and presented about use and usage, including in Portal: Libraries and the Academy.C

Jill E. Grogg is the e-resources librarian at the University of Alabama Libraries. Grogg has widely published on topics such as reference linking, e-resource management, and digital libraries. She was named a 2007 Mover & Shaker by Library Journal. V Chapter 1 "Assessing Use and Usage" is accessible on our MetaPress platform.

Buy a single copy in print at the ALA Store or as a PDF at MetaPress.

 

by Patrick Hogan at August 25, 2010 05:02 PM

Michael Stephens

Thanks GSLIS Office!

.flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; } .flickr-yourcomment { } .flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; } .flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; }


Thanks GSLIS Office!, originally uploaded by mstephens7.

Just a public shout out to the wonderful folks who keep our GSLIS Office running so smoothly – they sent me this lovely, colorful plant as I convalesce at home. Thanks all!

by Michael at August 25, 2010 04:39 PM

HangingTogether.org

Economics of Scholarly Production: Supplemental Materials

At the Spring CNI Taskforce meeting last April, Karen Wetzel (Standards Program Manager at NISO) announced a new piece of work related to “supplemental materials” in journal articles. In the scientific literature, it is not uncommon for articles to be accompanied by a secondary set of figures, data, documentation of experimental protocols that aren’t considered part of the core content. Karen reported that thought-leaders from a variety of sectors had expressed concerns about the expense that publishers incur in managing this material, as well as the additional work that it creates for editorial staff and authors. Libraries were included in a long list of potential stakeholders, as potential curators of this supplemental material.

A central concern is that scholarly citation and reuse of this kind of supporting material is limited by the absence of identifiers, bibliographic metadata etc. This is especially true for disciplines that lack official data centers that might provide DOI registration etc. to support discovery, preservation and even re-discovery services. As Sasha Schwarzman of the American Geophysical Union observes, this has important consequences for the longevity of the scholarly record:

while the main article is going to enjoy eternal life with many reincarnations along the way, supporting material is likely to rot and die, with very little possibility of resuscitation

[Alexander (Sasha) Schwarzman. Supporting Material. 2 November 2009]

There are some equally important operational and economic considerations. From an editorial perspective, there is concern that the “core” of an article may be buried in supplemental material, which is not always subject to rigorous peer review. From a publisher perspective, there is a reluctance to assume the costs of managing, marking up etc this content. From the researcher/author perspective, there is concern about how contributions are credited (e.g. first author on supplemental material v. fourth on the article) and confusion about standard formats for submission of supplemental materials.

In spite of all this, the trend is reportedly toward an increasing burden of supplemental materials in the journal literature. The Journal of Clinical Investigation (0021-9738) — which charges authors a supplemental fee for supplemental materials –- reports that the percentage of article submissions accompanied by secondary figures, data etc has been rising steadily in recent years:
jci

[Report of the Roundtable on Best Practices for Supplemental Journal Article Materials, Co-Sponsored by NFAIS and NISO, January 22, 2010]

I do not know what the outcomes of the NISO/NFAIS effort in this area have been thus far. Several working groups were to have been convened this summer, so presumably the work is still in course. Meanwhile, I was interested to see that the top-ranked Journal of Neursocience (1529-2401) has formally announced that it will no longer accept supplemental materials with article submissions. Henceforth, non-essential figures, tables, code libraries etc will be referenced in a footnote linked to an external Web site. Data sets and multimedia files will be accepted as part of the article content, but everything else will have to be hosted externally.

The Journal of Neuroscience points to the rapid increase in the size of supplemental materials submitted with manuscripts as a factor in its decision.

JNeuroSupMat

[”Announcement Regarding Supplemental Material” The Journal of Neuroscience, August 11, 2010, 30(32):10599-10600]

Optimistically, one might say the problem will resolve itself: aspiring authors will be forced — by editorial boards — to do a better job of writing articles that include all the necessary data and figures without recourse to voluminous supplements. Elegance and concision will be restored in the scientific literature, etc. But I would think this might still have knock-on effects for research institutions and perhaps libraries, as responsibility for managing those external websites will likely devolve to place where the work was performed.

As publishers like the J of Neuroscience renegotiate their role in scholarly communication and retrench their investment in the downstream products of research, universities will need to allocate more resource to managing the upstream processes and by-products of scientific/research practice.

This struck me as an instructive example of the “attention switch” that Lorcan Dempsey and Jim Michalko have talked about recently (here and there), viz., a change in the traditional library effort to bring the outside in by acquiring published content, to moving the inside out — taking greater responsibility for the stewardship of locally created research, teaching and learning materials.

by Constance at August 25, 2010 04:28 PM

Iris Jastram

Who stole my summer??

There’s always that one day — the day when you spend most of your day putting appointments into your calendar, the day when email volume doubles, the day when deadline work takes over and project work gets squeezed into a corner.

That day was Monday. Fall is coming.

Before Fall Term starts, I need to:

  • Read a sample of the sophomore writing portfolio to assess evidence of information literacy.
  • Finish writing up a report evaluating our joint technical and research help service point in the library.
  • Update a few research guides that are now out of date.
  • Create several brand new guides for brand new courses.
  • Plan various orientations and beginning-of-school events (must must must remember to schedule a meeting of that committee I’m chairing…)
  • Distill 2 days of discussion into a couple of action plans for our department
  • Remember to eat, preferably three times a day, though that hasn’t happened yet this week.

Considering I have just a couple of weeks to do those things in, and considering that a couple of those things could each take a couple of weeks, and further considering that more and more of my time each day is spent answering email now that everyone’s getting ready for Fall…

… But this is normal. This is August.

(Also, see what I just did here? This is the blogging equivalent of cleaning my house when I know I should be writing a paper.)

by Iris at August 25, 2010 04:05 PM

Google

Sixth annual Summer of Code flexes some serious geek girl muscle

Our sixth annual Google Summer of Code program has wrapped up and we want to highlight some of this year’s amazing participants and projects. Summer of Code offers students developers all over the world the chance to get paid to write code for open source projects as an alternative to a summer job.

Kicked off in 2005, the Summer of Code has brought together more than 3,400 students with more than 200 open source projects from all over the world to create millions of lines of code. We work with several open source, free software and technology-related groups to identify and fund projects through three months of coding.

There was some really awesome work done by more than 1,000 students from 69 countries in this year’s Summer of Code. Of those students, 6.5 percent were women representing 23 countries—six times higher than the estimated proportion of women in the open source community. Here are just a few of the women:

25 reference manuals in her purse
Ann Marie Horcher, an information systems security Ph.D. candidate at Nova Southeastern University was mentored by Docbook.org. Ann Marie worked over the summer to create an application that transformed a docbook file to epub format used in ebook readers such as the Amazon Kindle, the Barnes and Noble Nook and the iPad. As a result of Ann Marie’s project, it’s now easier to move technical documentation to a portable format so she “can carry my 25 reference manuals for my project with me in my purse.” And now, so can everyone else.

Check out Ann Marie’s YouTube video illustrating her work and its results here.

Geophylogenies now displayed on Google Earth
Kathryn Iverson, a University of Michigan bioinformatics graduate student was mentored by National Evolutionary Biology Synthesis Center and wrote a library implemented in Java with KML to build geophylogenies—geographical evolutionary histories of organisms. She told us: "Since I was starting from scratch it was up to me to decide in what direction I should move the project and make decisions about everything from what input filetypes to support to the color and size of the geophylogenies when they are displayed in Google Earth."


When asked about her key takeaways, she said, "Working remotely required me to be clear and verbose about what I needed because with the time difference (my mentor was on the other side of the globe), I may not get a response until the next day, which can slow down work tremendously if you're not clear in asking your questions."

Bridesmaid brings word tag clouds to biological networks
Layla Oesper, a Brown University computer science Ph.D. candidate mentored by Cytoscape, was attracted to Summer of Code because she was looking for a summer job that would give her the flexibility to work and still participate in two weddings. Layla built a plugin for Cytoscape that would allow people to create word tag clouds from biological networks they’d already created in Cytoscape, giving users a visual semantic summary of a biological network. The final product has all sorts of configurable features, including the ability to cluster together words that appear near each other in the original network in the order in which the words appear.

Check out what Layla learned during her Summer of Code experience on YouTube.

Drupal gets more content management friendly
Emily Brand, a computer science graduate student from Loyola University Chicago, was mentored by Drupal.org, an open source content management platform. During her summer, she worked on QueryPath—an essential part of the Drupal and PHP communities. Her goal was to keep and increase Drupal’s popularity by making it a go-to content management system for websites focused on web services using PHP.

Emily says she learned “how to effectively work on an open source project while keeping and improving the users and developers requirements as well as how to effectively integrate web services in Drupal.”


You can find out more about this year’s program and projects on the Open Source Blog, and if you’re in college looking to write some open source code, we hope we’ll see you next summer.

by A Googler (noreply@blogger.com) at August 25, 2010 04:14 PM

Stephen Abram

Women Dominant on Social Networks

Women Dominant on Social Networks

“According to the latest study conducted by comScore, “social networking sites reach a higher percentage of women than men worldwide. Other key statistics:

• Women spend 30% more time on social networking sites than men
• 75.8% of online women visited a social networking site in May 2010, compared with 69.7% of men
• North American women lead the pack – 90.3% of them visited a social networking site in April 2010, followed by online women in Latin America (83.6%) and Europe (83.4%)
• Social networking sites now capture the greatest share of all women’s total time and attention online (16.3%)
• 45+ female segment is driving the greatest proportion of growth for the social networking category in both visits and time spent

Visit MarketingProfs for an indepth discussion and to view charts and comparisons. (Free registration is required.)”

Hmmmmm….

Women Dominant on Social Networks

Women dominant in librarianship . . .

Women dominant in higher education student enrollment. . .

Anyone seeing a market trend?

Stephen

by admin at August 25, 2010 01:09 PM

O'Reilly Radar

The cut-free autopsy

Beautiful VisualizationThe field of data visualization is much broader than most people conceive of it, and exploring this breadth was one of our primary goals in compiling the projects described in "Beautiful Visualization." In the following excerpt, Anders Persson of Linköping University in Sweden explains how radiological digital imaging methods allow medical practitioners to conduct "virtual autopsies" without the use of a scalpel or any other invasive instrument.



Warning: Some readers could find the forensic illustrations in this post too graphic for their tastes. You might want to skip this one if you're squeamish.


The following was written by Anders Persson:

This chapter's topic is extremely important to those who work in the field of medical information visualization. Emerging technologies are enabling visual representations and interaction techniques that take advantage of the human eye’s broad-bandwidth pathway into the mind, allowing users to see, explore, understand, and validate large amounts of complex information at once.

A striking feature of both clinical routine and medical research today is the overwhelming amount of information -- particularly, information represented as images. Practitioners are dealing with ever-larger numbers of images (hundreds or thousands rather than dozens) and more complex, higher-dimensional information (vectors or tensors rather than scalar values, arranged in image volumes directly corresponding to the anatomy rather than flat images). However, they typically still use simple two-dimensional devices such as conventional monitors to review this overflow of images, one by one. As the bottleneck is no longer the acquisition of data, future progress will depend on the development of appropriate methods for handling and analyzing the information, as well as making it comprehensible to users. One of the most important issues for the future is the workflow. The entire chain from the acquisition of data until the point at which the clinician receives the diagnostic information must be optimized, and new methods must be validated.

Normally, performing this validation process on living patients has its limitations. It can in some cases be impossible to know if the acquired diagnostic information is correct as long as the patient is alive; the real gold standard is missing. Postmortem imaging has the potential to solve this problem.

The methodology of autopsy has not undergone any major transformation since its introduction in the middle of the 19th century. However, new radiological digital imaging methods, such as multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have the potential to become the main diagnostic tools in clinical and forensic pathology in the future. Postmortem visualization may prove to be a crucial tool in shaping tomorrow’s healthcare, by validating new imaging technology and for quality assurance issues.

Background

The importance of autopsy procedures leading to the establishment of the cause of death is well known. In forensic cases, the autopsy can provide key information and guide the criminal investigation. The decreasing trend in the frequency of autopsies over the past years has become a serious issue.

A recent addition to the autopsy workflow is the possibility of conducting postmortem imaging -- in its 3D version, also called virtual autopsy (VA) -- using MDCT or MRI data from scans of cadavers and with direct volume rendering (DVR) 3D techniques. At the foundation of the VA development are the modern imaging modalities that can generate large, high-quality datasets with submillimeter precision. Interactive visualization of these 3D datasets can provide valuable insight into the corpses and enables noninvasive diagnostic procedures. Efficient handling and analysis of the datasets is, however, problematic. For instance, in postmortem CT imaging, not being limited by a certain radiation dose per patient means the datasets can be generated with such a high resolution that they become difficult to handle in today’s archive retrieval and interactive visualization systems, specifically in the case of full body scans.

Several studies have shown the great potential of virtual autopsy in forensic investigations. This chapter will investigate several of the reasons for the rising interest in VA.

Impact on forensic work

The main questions to be assessed in examinations of the deceased are the cause and manner of death and the severity of injuries suffered, as well as the possibility of forensic reconstructions based on the obtained findings. Forensic documentation of postmortem findings is predominantly based on the same autopsy techniques and protocols that have been used for centuries. The main tools used are scalpels, verbal descriptions, and photographs.

A major disadvantage of this approach is that the documentation happens in a haphazard, subjective, and observer-dependent manner. Any findings that have not been documented are irreparably destroyed when the cadaver is sent to the crematory. Modern cross-sectional imaging techniques can overcome these shortcomings, as they provide datasets of cadavers that contain the findings in real dimensions and are storable for the future (Figures 18-1 and 18-2). The digitally acquired data can be referred to at any time as new questions arise, or may be sent to additional experts for a second opinion.

Metal objects can easily be located in the body with computed tomography. In this murder case, there is a knife that penetrates the face, but CT proved that this was not the cause of death.
Figure 18-1. Metal objects can easily be located in the body with computed tomography. In this murder case, there is a knife that penetrates the face, but CT proved that this was not the cause of death.



This image shows the cause of death in another case, where the victim was stabbed through the heart with a kitchen knife.

Figure 18-2. This image shows the cause of death in another case, where the victim was stabbed through the heart with a kitchen knife.

Some findings that are difficult to visualize in a conventional autopsy can easily be seen in a full body CT, such as air distribution within the body -- e.g., in the pneumothorax, pneumopericardium, bloodstream (air embolism), and wound channels (Figure 18-3). A CT can also be invaluable for locating foreign objects such as metal fragments and bullets, which are of great importance for the forensic pathologist (Figure 18-4).

The acquired CT data can be visualized interactively with different parameter settings: in this case, soft tissue to the left and air distribution in the body to the right.
Figure 18-3. The acquired CT data can be visualized interactively with different parameter settings: in this case, soft tissue to the left and air distribution in the body to the right.



Tiny lead fragments from a shotgun can easily be visualized with postmortem CT. In a conventional autopsy, these fragments can be difficult or even impossible to find.

Figure 18-4. Tiny lead fragments from a shotgun can easily be visualized with postmortem CT. In a conventional autopsy, these fragments can be difficult or even impossible to find.

The virtual autopsy procedure

The Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV) at Linköping University Hospital in Sweden, in collaboration with the Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, has developed a procedure for virtual autopsy that is now used routinely for forensic work. This method has been in use since 2003 and has been applied to over 300 cases so far (mostly homicides).

Our experience with VA has shown that full-body, high-resolution DVR visualizations are of great value in criminal investigations and for the validation of new technologies on living patients. Our work has focused on the total workflow for postmortem MDCT and on developing a new type of software that can visualize full-body datasets that could previously only be viewed in separate parts and with limited interactivity (Figures 18-5 to 18-7).

After a conventional autopsy, it is impossible to go back. Findings that have not been documented are irreparably destroyed when the cadaver is sent to the crematory.
Figure 18-5. After a conventional autopsy, it is impossible to go back. Findings that have not been documented are irreparably destroyed when the cadaver is sent to the crematory.

With CT and/or MRI added to the pipeline, it is always possible to go back and redo the virtual autopsy. The digitally acquired data can be referred to at any time when new questions arise, and may be sent to experts for a second opinion.
Figure 18-6. With CT and/or MRI added to the pipeline, it is always possible to go back and redo the virtual autopsy. The digitally acquired data can be referred to at any time when new questions arise, and may be sent to experts for a second opinion.



There is a turf battle between the CSI guys and the police regarding keeping the body in the cold storage room.

Figure 18-7. There is a turf battle between the CSI guys and the police regarding keeping the body in the cold storage room. The police are keen on having the autopsy done as soon as possible. The CSI guys try to close the crime scene investigation before the autopsy takes place. Postmortem imaging solves this problem. A preliminary report from the postmortem CT examination makes it possible to preserve the body in the cold storage room.



Data acquisition


The traditional physical autopsy at CMIV is extended by adding the CT and MRI as VA activities. In most cases, the forensic pathologist comes to the crime scene and oversees the handling of the human cadaver, which is placed in a sealed body bag before being transported to the forensic department and put in cold storage. The following morning, a full-body dual source CT (DSCT) scan is performed at CMIV with a state-of-the-art SOMATOM Definition Flash scanner (from Siemens Medical Solutions in Germany). Currently, both single- and dual-energy modes are used for virtual autopsy cases; see Figure 18-8(a) and (b).

In selected cases, an MRI examination is also performed (using an Achieva 1.5T scanner, from Philips Medical Systems in The Netherlands). All children are routinely examined with MRI, because it offers superior visualization of the brain compared to DSCT (Figure 18-9). The cadaver remains in the body bag throughout the virtual autopsy procedure to ensure the security of technical evidence of forensic value, such as fibers and body fluids, and to avoid contamination.



(a) A state-of-the-art dual source computed tomography scanner with dual energy possibilities. (b) A magnetic resonance scanner. Both scanners are used for virtual autopsies at CMIV.

Figure 18-8. (a) A state-of-the-art dual source computed tomography scanner with dual energy possibilities. (b) A magnetic resonance scanner. Both scanners are used for virtual autopsies at CMIV.



Dual energy CT of a small child who has been shot. Note the excellent visualization of the bullet and the bullet track. Easy to present in the courtroom.

Figure 18-9. Dual energy CT of a small child who has been shot. Note the excellent visualization of the bullet and the bullet track. Easy to present in the courtroom.



Computed tomography: Use of dual energy CT


Dual energy CT (DECT) with two x-ray sources running simultaneously at different energies can acquire two datasets showing different attenuation levels. DECT allows additional information about the elementary chemical composition of CT-scanned material to be obtained. Compton scattering can be determined by using two different average photo energies, which correspond to two different tube voltages (80 and 140 kV).

In other words, x-ray absorption is energy-dependent -- e.g., scanning an object with 80 kV results in a different attenuation than scanning it with 140 kV. This physics phenomenon can help to discriminate between materials with similar atomic numbers, such as calcium and iodine contrast. Colors can then be assigned according to changes in the CT numbers between the two energy settings, and the resulting color-mapped, dual-energy image can differentiate between calcifications and iodine contrast.

This technique can also be used to better visualize postmortem blood clots in vessels, and possibly bleeding in soft tissue. The material-specific difference in attenuation shown in the resulting image could facilitate classifications of different tissue types such as blood, soft tissue, tendons, and cartilage (Figure 18-10).



Tendons examined with dual energy CT. Tendons and small vessels can be visualized without IV contrast. Ligaments between the carpal bones are visualized.

Figure 18-10. Tendons examined with dual energy CT. Tendons and small vessels can be visualized without IV contrast. Ligaments between the carpal bones are visualized.

DECT has the potential to be an important diagnostic tool in the healthcare of tomorrow. However, further research needs to be done to explore this new technique. VA can speed up this research.

MRI: Use of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging

It is difficult to generate good contrast MRI images on dead, cold bodies -- body temperature influences the MR relaxation times of all tissues, and hence clinically established protocols need to be adjusted for optimal image quality at any given temperature. This problem can be solved by measurement of the absolute MR tissue parameters for tissue characterization, T1, T2, and proton density (PD).

Since this can be difficult to implement on a clinical MRI scanner, a new approach has been invented at CMIV called synthetic MRI. In this approach, the three absolute parameters are translated into ordinary MR contrast images (Figures 18-11 and 18-12). A color scale can be used such that each tissue acquires a specific color composition depending on its MR tissue parameters, independent of body temperature. Since the MR parameters are absolute, an identical color transformation will lead to a specific color-to-tissue relation, and a visual segmentation of tissue. Especially for postmortem imaging, this is important, since the image contrast may vary dramatically with temperature (Figure 18-12).



Example of synthetic MRI on a living patient: the upper row are conventional images and the lower row are the synthetic counterpart based on a single dataset.

Figure 18-11. Example of synthetic MRI on a living patient: the upper row are conventional images and the lower row are the synthetic counterpart based on a single dataset.



Full-body synthetic MRI scan. The contrast can be synthesized, the tissue can be segmented, and based on the MR parameters even temperature can be established.

Figure 18-12. Full-body synthetic MRI scan. The contrast can be synthesized, the tissue can be segmented, and based on the MR parameters even temperature can be established.

Postmortem examinations do not suffer from motion artifacts, and high-resolution images can be obtained with a long scan time. An example is shown in Figure 18-13, which shows a head shot wound in 1.2 mm isotropic resolution. Since synthetic MRI is based on absolute values, it can be used to render 3D images with CT postprocessing software, resulting in the volume renderings displayed in Figures 18-13 and 18-14.



Postmortem synthetic MRI examination of a gunshot wound in high isotropic resolution. Red color in the lefthand image represents blood.

Figure 18-13. Postmortem synthetic MRI examination of a gunshot wound in high isotropic resolution. Red color in the lefthand image represents blood.

Automatic segmentation of cerebrospinal fluid (19.8 ml for this slice) and pathology (1.9 ml for this slice) with synthetic MRI.
Figure 18-14. Automatic segmentation of cerebrospinal fluid (19.8 ml for this slice) and pathology (1.9 ml for this slice) with synthetic MRI.

Visualization: image analysis

In preparation for the physical autopsy, the pathologist and the radiologist conduct a collaborative DVR session. They can obtain a clear survey of the entire body quickly, and localize fractures and air pockets. The full-body procedure permits fast localization of foreign objects such as metal fragments or bullets. Another important aspect is the high resolution of the data, which, in a seamless visualization, allows details such as dental information to be extracted for identification purposes (Figure 18-15). This can provide essential information in the early part of a police investigation. After scanning, the forensic personnel leave CMIV and start the conventional autopsy. Data from the collaborative DVR session is transferred to the forensic institute for them to use, and if more information is needed later, new contact with the radiologist is made.



With volume rendering 3D, it is possible to interactively change settings so that the body can be visualized seamlessly, from skin to skeleton.

Figure 18-15. With volume rendering 3D, it is possible to interactively change settings so that the body can be visualized seamlessly, from skin to skeleton.



Objective documentation


An important added value of the virtual autopsy procedure is that the captured DSCT data is stored, which enables the procedure to be iterated. Often, findings during the physical autopsy lead to new questions that the VA can answer. The pathologist and the crime investigators can also -- at any point during the investigation -- re-examine the cadaver and search for additional information (Figure 18-16). Moreover, in crime scene investigations, new findings may require other hypotheses to be scrutinized by postmortal imaging.

Dual energy CT of the heart and the coronary arteries. More plaque components can be visualized with dual energy compared to conventional single energy images (red circle).
Figure 18-16. Dual energy CT of the heart and the coronary arteries. More plaque components can be visualized with dual energy compared to conventional single energy images (red circle).

VA is currently used as a complement to the autopsy procedure. It should, however, be noted that the workflow overhead introduced is minimal, as the time needed for the DSCT scan and visualization session is short in comparison to the physical autopsy, and that it can make the autopsy more efficient because the pathologist will have prior knowledge of the case before beginning the autopsy. That the cadaver remains in a sealed body bag throughout the VA procedure also secures technical evidence, such as fibers and body fluids, which in forensic cases may be of great importance.

Advantages and disadvantages of virtual autopsy

Let’s take a look at the advantages of VA compared with conventional autopsies:

-- It is time-saving. The VA can be a complement to standard autopsies, enabling broad, systematic examinations of the whole body that are normally difficult and time consuming; for example, an examination of the entire bone structure or searching for the presence of air in the body (Figures 18-3 and 18-4).



-- It is noninvasive. Once an invasive traditional autopsy has taken place, the body cannot be reassembled in its original state, thus precluding other forensic pathologists from conducting a fresh analysis on the same body (Figures 18-5 through 18-7).



-- A traditional autopsy may be rejected by family members, perhaps due to religious beliefs that prohibit the desecration of the remains of a deceased person. For example, Orthodox Judaism prohibits disturbing dead bodies except when such action may save others, and decrees that practices such as organ removal should be avoided. Islam is likewise opposed to desecrating or even exposing the body of a deceased believer.



-- Autopsy protocols and photographs used as evidence in criminal cases can be difficult for jurors to understand. VA visualizations are typically clearer (Figures 18-4 and 18-9).

-- Storage of VA data poses few problems, whereas autopsy records such as tissue sections are difficult to store indefinitely (Figure 18-16).



-- With potential global pandemics such as bird flu (avian influenza A) and swine flu (the H1N1 virus) posing an increasing threat, the practice of eviscerating the victims can pose serious health risks to coroners, pathologists, and medical examiners. With a VA, these risks are minimized.



However, virtual autopsies also have several shortcomings:

-- For MDCT, soft tissue discrimination is low. Energy-resolved CT (DECT) has the potential to resolve this problem (Figure 18-10).

-- The large amount of data produced is a problem to analyze, but better and faster postprocessing programs should solve this.

-- MRI is a time-consuming investigation and not optimal on a cold body. Synthetic MRI is a promising alternative (Figure 18-14).

-- Postmortem imaging with MDCT and MRI does not give any color documentation of the body. It may be possible to solve this issue with new volume-rendering 3D methods and body surface scanning (Figure 18-15).

-- Macro morphology is absent (no histology and chemistry). This can be solved to a certain extent with MDCT guided biopsies or magnetic resonance spectroscopy (Figure 18-16).

-- Circulation and possible bleeding points are difficult to visualize, although promising results have been achieved with postmortem angiography. As has been shown, postmortem CT angiography can be a feasible way to obtain more information from the VA (Figure 18-17).

-- Postmortal gas can be difficult to distinguish from other types of gas (bowel gas, gas in wound channels, etc.). Therefore, it is important to execute the postmortem imaging examination soon after death has occurred (Figure 18-18).

Contrast injected in arteries postmortem with good results in horse and antelope. Data has been acquired with dual energy CT.
Figure 18-17. Contrast injected in arteries postmortem with good results in horse and antelope. Data has been acquired with dual energy CT.



Contrast injected in arteries postmortem with good results in horse and antelope. Data has been acquired with dual energy CT.

Figure 18-18. With conventional autopsies, different kinds of body gases are difficult to examine.

The future for virtual autopsies

Both MDCT and MRI can be used for postmortem imaging. In principle, it is easy to visualize bone, gas, and metal with MDCT. However, it is important to be aware of not only the capabilities, but also the limitations of these technologies.

Visualization research in the future must include the overall aim of implementing a virtual autopsy workstation that includes everything needed to perform state-of-the-art virtual autopsies. Visualization tools to increase the quality and efficiency of virtual autopsy procedures need to be developed. Research and development efforts focusing on novel rendering and classification techniques are also needed to improve usability and to specifically address forensic questions. Another important goal is to establish designated protocols for the main forensic case categories.

The data analysis research includes the implementation of computer-aided diagnostic tools that can, once applied to the postmortem data, help search for and characterize relevant forensic findings. These tools can also deliver general information about the deceased individual such as height, body weight, sex, major injuries, foreign bodies (e.g., projectiles), and likely causes of death in an automatically generated preliminary, written virtual autopsy protocol.

When all of these tasks have been successfully addressed, the technology involved within all processes of a virtual autopsy can be improved to enable automation of the entire workflow. This will allow for virtual autopsies to be performed in large numbers within a reasonable time frame. This would be invaluable in handling incidents with significant numbers of victims such as those created by the tsunami catastrophe in Asia in 2004, where no autopsies were performed at all.

As terrorists improve their applied technologies day by day, it is unthinkable that forensic pathologists should not also be able to make use of emerging technologies in order to gather as much information as possible from their victims (Figure 18-19). In times where no one can really feel safe, we should not only focus on the prevention of catastrophe, but also prepare ourselves to handle disasters adequately when they do occur.



Postmortem CT of a burned person. Metal in the body makes it impossible to use MRI. Before the CT examination, there was no suspicion of murder, but several fractures that could not be explained pointed the investigators in the right direction -- murder.

Figure 18-19. Postmortem CT of a burned person. Metal in the body makes it impossible to use MRI. Before the CT examination, there was no suspicion of murder, but several fractures that could not be explained pointed the investigators in the right direction -- murder.


For a new era of digital autopsies to truly emerge, several forces must work in unison. Medical professionals and legal authorities must determine standard protocols for scanning and storing data. Legal systems around the world must accept the admissibility of imaging evidence in determining the cause and manner of death. Also, specialists in new fields such as postmortem radiology will need to be trained. Radiologists are typically trained to interpret images of living patients, but the dead often look different; severe trauma or the effects of decomposition can displace organs. Understanding these differences will require knowledge and expertise that does not exist on a widespread basis today.

Invasive autopsies will likely remain the norm for at least the next few years. However, in some cases, we may begin to see traditional autopsies being replaced by noninvasive virtual autopsies, with minimally invasive, image-guided tissue sampling conducted when necessary. Postmortem VA has the potential to gain high acceptance in the population compared with the traditional autopsy, making it possible to maintain high levels of quality control in forensic and traditional medicine.

Conclusion

The virtual autopsy is a newly developed procedure that will enhance the classic autopsy, giving it the capacity to achieve more reliable results. In some cases, the virtual autopsy could also replace the normal autopsy. Research on the unique aspects of postmortem radiology must, however, be undertaken to identify cases in which its use is most beneficial and to validate the new procedures. Clearly, the introduction of this new autopsy method is likely to have a major impact on forensic medicine, the judicial system, the police, and general medicine in the future.



Related:



Get the "Beautiful Visualization" ebook for $9.99. Use discount code BLV99.



References and suggested reading

Donchin, Y., A.I. Rivkind, J. Bar-Ziv, J. Hiss, J. Almog, and M. Drescher. 1994. “Utility of postmortem computed tomography in trauma victims.” Journal of Trauma 37, no. 4: 552-555.

Etlik, Ö., O. Temizöz, A. Dogan, M. Kayan, H. Arslan, and Ö. Unal. 2004. “Three-dimensional volume rendering imaging in detection of bone fractures.” European Journal of General Medicine 1, no. 4: 48-52.

Jackowski, C. 2003. “Macroscopical and histological findings in comparison with CT- and MRI- examinations of isolated autopsy hearts.” Thesis, Institute of Forensic Medicine. O.-v.-G.-University of Magdeburg.

Jackowski, C., A. Persson, and M. Thali. 2008. “Whole body postmortem angiography with a high viscosity contrast agent solution using poly ethylene glycol (PEG) as contrast agent dissolver.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 53, no. 2: 465-468.

Jackowski, C., W. Schweitzer, M. Thali, K. Yen, E. Aghayev, M. Sonnenschein, P. Vock, and R. Dirnhofer. 2005. “Virtopsy: Postmortem imaging of the human heart in situ using MSCT and MRI.” Forensic Science International 149, no. 1: 11-23.

Jackowski, C., M. Sonnenschein, M. Thali, E. Aghayev, G. von Allmen, K. Yen, R. Dirnhofer, and P. Vock. 2005. “Virtopsy:

Kerner, T., G. Fritz, A. Unterberg, and K. Falke. 2003. “Pulmonary air embolism in severe head injury.” Resuscitation 56, no. 1: 111-115.

Ljung, P., C. Winskog, A. Persson, C. Lundstrom, and A. Ynnerman. 2006. “Full-body virtual autopsies using a state-of-the-art volume rendering pipeline.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, no. 5: 869-876.

Oliver, W.R., A.S. Chancellor, M. Soltys, J. Symon, T. Cullip, J. Rosenman, R. Hellman, A. Boxwala, and W. Gormley. 1995. “Three-dimensional reconstruction of a bullet path: Validation by computed radiography.”Journal of Forensic Sciences, 40, no. 2: 321-324.

Ros, P.R., K.C. Li, P. Vo, H. Baer, and E.V. Staab. 1990. “Preautopsy magnetic resonance imaging: Initial experience.” Magnetic Resonance Imaging 8: 303-308.

Thali, M., W. Schweitzer, K. Yen, P. Vock, C. Ozdoba, E. Spielvogel, and R. Dirnhofer. 2003. “New horizons in forensic radiology: The 60-second digital autopsy-full-body examination of a gunshot victim by multislice computed tomography.” The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 24: 22-27.

Thali, M., U. Taubenreuther, M. Karolczak, M. Braun, W. Brueschweiler, W. Kalender, and R. Dirnhofer. 2003. “Forensic microradiology: Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT) and analysis of patterned injuries inside of bone.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 48, no. 6: 1336-1342.

Thali, M., K. Yen, W. Schweitzer, P. Vock, C. Boesch, C. Ozdoba, G. Schroth, M. Ith, M. Sonnenschein, T. Doernhoefer, E. Scheurer, T. Plattner, and R. Dirnhofer. 2003. “Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: Virtual autopsy by post-mortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) -- a feasibility study.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 48, no. 2: 386-403.

Yen, K., P. Vock, B. Tiefenthaler, G. Ranner, E. Scheurer, M. Thali, K. Zwygart, M. Sonnenschein, M. Wiltgen, and R. Dirnhofer. 2004. “Virtopsy: Forensic traumatology of the subcutaneous fatty tissue; Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as diagnostic tools.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 49, no. 4: 799-806.

by Julie Steele at August 25, 2010 01:00 PM

Stephen Abram

Framework for 21st Century Learning

With the school year starting anew, it’s time to refresh our knowledge on K-12 education strategic thinking. School librarians and teachers are mostly aware of these changes and working through the adaptations. It’s a good idea for public libraries to keep aware of the changes as you support homework and and home study. I have found ths website useful (there are a lot more but this is a good pace to start).

Framework for 21st Century Learning

The Framework presents a holistic view of 21st century teaching and learning that combines a discrete focus on 21st century student outcomes (a blending of specific skills, content knowledge, expertise and literacies) with innovative support systems to help students master the multi-dimensional abilities required of them in the 21st century.

The key elements of 21st century learning are represented in the graphic and descriptions below. The graphic represents both 21st century skills student outcomes (as represented by the arches of the rainbow) and 21st century skills support systems (as represented by the pools at the bottom). ”


“While the graphic represents each element distinctly for descriptive purposes, the Partnership views all the components as fully interconnected in the process of 21st century teaching and learning.”

It’s very hard to keep with changes in educational theory, practice and thinking but this site does a good job in covering some of the latest advances and plans. Not every state or district is adopting the 21C approach but it has been very influential in recent years.

Some public libraries might want to consider in-service sessions in partnership with their local school boards to ensure that their reference activities and program straetgies and aligned with board strategies and student success and goals. It is a great partnership opportunity. Understanding education today can start with sharing and conversations.

Stephen

by admin at August 25, 2010 12:41 PM

Ed Summers

top hosts referenced in wikipedia (part 2)

Jodi Schneider pointed out to me in an email that my previous post about the top 100 hosts referenced in wikipedia may have been slightly off balance since it counted *all* pages on wikipedia (talk pages, files, etc), and was not limited to only links in articles. The indicator for her was the high ranking of www.google.com, which seemed odd to her in the article space.

So I downloaded the enwiki-latest-page.sql.gz, loaded it in, and then joined on it in my query to come up with a new list. Jodi was right, it’s a lot more interesting:

This removed a lot of the interwiki links between the English wikipedia and other language wikipedias (which would be interesting to look at in their own right). It also removed administrative links to things like www.dnsstuff.com. Also interesting is that it removed www.facebook.com from the list, which probably were linked to from user profile pages? The neat thing is it introduced new sites into the top 100 like the following:

adsabs.harvard.edu
bioguide.congress.gov
cfa-www.harvard.edu
eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov
openjurist.org
select.nytimes.com
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov
worldcat.org
www1.arbitron.com
www.animenewsnetwork.com
www.cbc.ca
www.cricinfo.com
www.cricketarchive.com
www.discogs.com
www.expasy.org
www.fifa.com
www.gutenberg.org
www.history.navy.mil
www.hockeydb.com
www.imagesofengland.org.uk
www.independent.co.uk
www.jstor.org
www.leighrayment.com
www.mtv.com
www.nfl.com
www.nhm.ac.uk
www.nps.gov
www.racingpost.com
www.radio-locator.com
www.reuters.com
www.rollingstone.com
www.rsssf.com
www.soccerbase.com
www.usatoday.com
www.variety.com

We can see a lot more pop culture media present: newspapers, magazines, sporting information. Also we can see research oriented websites like worldcat.org, ssd.jpl.nasa.gov, adsabs.harvard.edu make it into the top 100.

I work for the US federal government so I was interested to look at what .gov domains were in the top 100:

hostname links
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov 419816
www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov 62134
geonames.usgs.gov 57423
factfinder.census.gov 48530
www.census.gov 33018
www.nr.nps.gov 25962
www.fcc.gov 25941
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov 20178
eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov 20063
bioguide.congress.gov 18880
www.nlm.nih.gov 15115
www.nps.gov 12196

Which points to the importance of federal biomedical, geospatial, scientific, demographic and biographical information to wikipedians. It would be interesting to take a look at higher education institutions at some point. Doing these one off reports is giving me some ideas about what linkypedia could turn into. Thanks Jodi.

by ed at August 25, 2010 12:27 PM

O'Reilly Radar

Four short links: 25 August 2010

  1. Why Narrative and Structure are Important (Ed Yong) -- Ed looks at how Atul Gawande's piece on death and dying, which is 12,000 words long, is an easy and fascinating read despite the length.
  2. Understanding Science (Berkeley) -- simple teaching materials to help students understand the process of science. (via BoingBoing comments)
  3. Sax: Symbolic Aggregate approXimation -- SAX is the first symbolic representation for time series that allows for dimensionality reduction and indexing with a lower-bounding distance measure. In classic data mining tasks such as clustering, classification, index, etc., SAX is as good as well-known representations such as Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT), while requiring less storage space. In addition, the representation allows researchers to avail of the wealth of data structures and algorithms in bioinformatics or text mining, and also provides solutions to many challenges associated with current data mining tasks. One example is motif discovery, a problem which we recently defined for time series data. There is great potential for extending and applying the discrete representation on a wide class of data mining tasks. Source code has "non-commercial" license. (via rdamodharan on Delicious)
  4. Open Source OSCON (RedMonk) -- The business of selling open source software, remember, is dwarfed by the business of using open source software to produce and sell other services. And yet historically, most of the focus on open source software has accrued to those who sold it. Today, attention and traction is shifting to those who are not in the business of selling software, but rather share their assets via a variety of open source mechanisms. (via Simon Phipps)

by Nat Torkington at August 25, 2010 10:00 AM

Jason Griffey

iPad demo at Texas Library Association conference

Here’s a video of me demoing The Elements ebook on the iPad at the Texas Library Association conference this past summer. Was just a quick tech demo of how things like The Elements will change our concept of a “book” in new ways because of the technological possibilities of these new platforms.

by griffey at August 25, 2010 02:46 AM

Nicole Engard

Today’s Bookmarks 08/25/2010

  • OpenDocMan is a free PHP document management system (DMS) designed to comply with ISO 17025 and OIE standard for document management. It features web based access, fine grained control of access to files, and automated install and upgrades.

    tags: opensource document documentation management

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

by Nicole at August 25, 2010 12:35 AM

August 24, 2010

ACRLog

New and Improved – or Not?

One of the lovely surprises awaiting those who have been away from the reference desk for a while is the numerous spanking new database interfaces that have sprouted up. There seem to be more than usual this year, and while some are improvements, others, frankly, need a good spanking. One that has us particularly flummoxed is the new JSTOR interface that defaults to searching material your library doesn’t have and offers new layers of confusion. (”Is this article available at my library in another database?” “Sorry, we can’t tell you that, but we can provide a handy link through our publisher sales service to purchase articles.”)

As an aside, do publishers seriously expect people to purchase articles for $12, $25, or $35 a pop? Really? They have not met my patrons. But I digress.

I was coasting along in blissful ignorance until I got this guest post from our occasional correspondent from Bowling Green State University, Amy Fry. I have a feeling JSTOR will be getting a lot of feedback on their “improvements.” Here are some thoughts to start the conversation.

—-

What Were They Thinking?
Amy Fry
Electronic Resources Coordinator
Bowling Green State University

Today is the first day of the new semester at BGSU, and also the first school day of the new JSTOR interface.

What were they thinking?

JSTOR began life as a journal archive, but librarians have long treated it as an all-full-text, all-scholarly database for journal literature. While its search interface lagged, with limited options to weed out unwanted items or zero in on the most relevant results, its content was stellar, and librarians felt confident promoting it to students as a reliable place to find full-text scholarly sources. As a result, JSTOR has a strong brand not only with librarians, but with faculty and students at all kinds of institutions. Those days appear to be over, at least for now.

Last year, JSTOR embarked on a “current scholarship” endeavor, which allows libraries to use JSTOR as a portal for current subscriptions to some titles. The interface upgrade that went into effect this weekend was meant to support that program. But now that the upgraded interface is live, I can see what this means for JSTOR libraries.

JSTOR has added several confusing layers to its formerly reliable content archive that are guaranteed to confound the most experienced JSTOR user. The search screen contains two limiters – “include only content I can access” and “include links to external content.” The first is unchecked by default and the second is checked by default. This guarantees the broadest journal searching in the archive, but it also means that, after doing a search, users at many institutions will see three kinds of results – ones that are full text, ones that give citation and “access options,” and ones indicating there may be full text on an “external site.”

These last are the “current issues,” and have appeared in JSTOR search results (for titles in libraries’ subscribed JSTOR modules) since last year. Clicking on one of these in the results list shows its citation, abstract and references. Since we have enabled openURL on JSTOR, it also shows our openURL button (which will allow users to link to full text or interlibrary loan). Next to our openURL button, however, there is a box that says “you may not have access,” and to “select the ‘article on external site’ link to go to a site with the article’s full text.” Nowhere on this page do I see an “article on external site” link, but at least the openURL button is there.

The real problem is with the other articles – the ones that only offer “citations and access options.” These are articles from the modules of JSTOR to which my institution does not subscribe. Formerly, articles from non-subscribed JSTOR modules did not even appear in my institution’s JSTOR search results. This was certainly preferable to how these are handled now: now when users click on them, they see the first page of the pdf and have the option to show the citation information, but at the top of the screen is a yellow box containing the text, “You do not have access to this item. Login or check our access options.” Clicking on “login” takes users to the MyJSTOR login screen which asks for your MyJSTOR username and password or gives users the option to choose their institution from a list of Athens/Shibboleth libraries. Clicking on “access options” informs the user he or she must be a member of a participating institution, links to a list of participating institutions, then gives the user the option to purchase individual articles or subscriptions. Worse, newer articles display a price and direct link to purchase the article right next to the first page of the pdf.

Nowhere on this screen do users have the option to use openURL to link to full text or interlibrary loan. In effect, JSTOR has pre-empted library subscriptions to current content for links to purchase articles directly from publishers. For example, if I found an article from The Reading Teacher in JSTOR, I will see the option to purchase it, but be offered no other way to access the full text. If the openURL button for my library appeared there, I would know that my library has access to this article in half a dozen other databases and I would never have the need to purchase it.

Academic librarians at institutions like mine – non-Athens/Shibboleth, non-full-JSTOR-archive subscribers, can expect to get a ton of questions now from students. Expecting JSTOR to be (at least mostly) full text as it has always been, these students will log in upon accessing the database (if they are off campus). When they find one of these “access options” articles in JSTOR, they will try logging in again, then, when that doesn’t work, they will look for our institution in the list of Athens/Shibboleth institutions. Then, if it’s an article they really want, they will call or IM the library and explain that JSTOR is asking them for a login, which will be a troubleshooting struggle as this usually only happens when students try to access JSTOR from Google or Google Scholar. In the worst-case scenario, they will waste their money on content we already purchase elsewhere. In an even worse worst-case scenario, they will abandon JSTOR as another confusing and misleading library website and turn to other sources. Students are not terribly likely to purchase individual articles – they are more likely to move on and try to find something that is full text, even if it is less relevant. This may turn out to be a boon to EBSCO, but it’s going to frustrating as hell for libraries, and could turn sour for JSTOR.

JSTOR apologists will no doubt point out that individual users can change their limiter options on the initial search screen and search only content that will give them full-text results in JSTOR. But they will only do this if they understand what “include only content I can access” and “include links to external content” mean and, despite the explanatory text linked to the latter, I am not even entirely sure what these mean. Is “content I can access” just my institution’s JSTOR modules, or does it include “current issues” links for titles in my institution’s JSTOR modules, and, if so, are all of these indeed titles I have full-text access to through my institution’s current subscriptions? Good question. Do the “links to external content” mean just current issues and, if so, are they current issues for just titles in my library’s JSTOR modules, or for those in all JSTOR modules? I have made notes to ask JSTOR these questions when they get back to me about why the heck my openURL button doesn’t appear in results with the other “access options” for articles outside our JSTOR modules, but most users don’t even realize JSTOR has modules, and likely will not be able to understand what these two limiters mean, even after they’ve done a search.

So, what is JSTOR thinking? It seems like they are trying to move the archive towards being an expanded content platform in order to become an expanded platform for discovery, but have skipped some vital steps along the way. Let’s not forget, JSTOR has no administrative module, it has certainly not fully implemented openURL (as this platform upgrade shows), and though it does offer COUNTER Journal reports, it still offers no COUNTER-compliant statistics for sessions and searches.

—–

I think Amy has nailed it by describing this as a fundamental shift from journal archive to “discovery platform.” I don’t know how your users will respond, but I predict mine will be confused and unhappy – at least until they get the hang of manually selecting “content I can access” every time they search. (There is no option for libraries to set that as a default.) Much as I respect JSTOR, I’m not looking forward to the questions we’ll be getting.

What do you think?

Illustration courtesy of autumn_bliss.

by Barbara Fister at August 24, 2010 10:21 PM

BlogJunction

Building your library community

WebJunction sponsored my “Inside, Outside, & Online” program at the joint PNLA/WLA conference in Victoria BC last week. I thought you might like to see my slides from that presentation.

The program is based on my book (same title), available from ALA Editions here. (Sorry, I couldn’t help but insert a tiny bit of self promotion!)

The program runs through the five elements of community building that we uncovered in our research for this work (needs assessment, service design & delivery, marketing, evaluation, and sustainability), and provides pictures and examples from many of the library staff that I talked with throughout the process. Embedded throughout are a number of questions for the audience – as I invited them to consider how their personal and organizational experiences related to the stories that I relayed. I invite you to do the same … I’d love to hear from you!

by chrystie at August 24, 2010 08:34 PM

LISWire

LISWire: University Libraries and College Libraries Sections Call For Proposals for our 2011 ALA Annual Program

The University Libraries and College Libraries Sections invite proposals for our 2011 ALA Annual Conference Program:

Academic Librarian Lightning Round! Innovative New Roles

Innovative College and University Librarians are increasingly assuming new academic, governance, professional, and service roles and responsibilities. By forging new pathways and partnerships, academic librarians can reassert the centrality of the library in their colleges and universities, and expand their expertise to benefit the core missions of their library and their institution. This fast-paced program features a variety of Lighting Talk presentations (also known as Pecha Kucha presentations) that dive right to the heart of the issue and engage the audience.

RULES: 5 minute presentation, 20 slides, 15 seconds per slide

EXAMPLES:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NZOt6BkhUg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKe_cX5Ms_w&feature=related

Proposals should include a title and 75-word description of the presentation. They can be submitted here:

https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFZyb1MzVGtodWtTT0hHNEN...

Proposals will be due SEPTEMBER 15, 2010.

Notifications of acceptance will be made by November 1, 2010.

For more information, please contact Catherine Doyle, cdoyle0@zimbra.naz.edu

August 24, 2010 07:35 PM

Stephen Abram

Are you a Cat or a Dog person? Take my poll!

Let’s have some fun!

I made the outrageous comment on a recent blog post that I though library folk were mostly cat people. Some agreed and some (presumably dog people) disagreed. It was all tongue-in-cheek! And the video was a hoot.

So, without a whit of science to it, let’s take a pool of my blog readers and anyone else in library land who wants to participate.

Take the poll.


http://polldaddy.com/poll/3666817/”>Cats http://polldaddy.com/poll/3666817/”>Cats http://polldaddy.com/poll/3666817/”>Cats & Dogshttp://polldaddy.com/features-surveys/”>Market http://polldaddy.com/features-surveys/”>Market http://polldaddy.com/features-surveys/”>Market Research

As usual I’ll publish the results here.

And I promise the next poll will be more serious but we are in the end of August doldrums and we deserve some fun before all Hell breaks loose and the patrons, students, learners, etc. arrive in full force soon.

I’ve had, if I remember correctly, about an even number of dogs and cats – sometimes in twos but never mixed.

Stephen

by admin at August 24, 2010 07:00 PM

Infopeople

How blind people see the Internet

We talk a lot in libraries about accessibility, and how important it is to make sure that special needs users can access all of our services. But what is a blind user’s Internet experience like? This Gizmodo article does a nice job of laying it out for us sighted folks. Good stuff!

by eileen at August 24, 2010 06:35 PM

Ed Summers

notes on retooling libraries

If you work in the digital preservation field and haven’t seen Dorothea Salo’s Retooling Libraries for the Data Challenge in the latest issue of Ariadne definitely give it a read. Dorothea takes an unflinching look at the at the scope and characteristics of data assets currently being generated by scholarly research, and how equipped traditional digital library efforts are to deal with it. I haven’t seen so many of the issues I’ve had to deal with (largely unconsciously) as part of my daily work so neatly summarized before. Having them laid out in such a lucid, insightful and succinct way is really refreshing–and inspiring.

In the section on Taylorist Production Processes, Dorothea makes a really good point that libraries have tended to optimize workflows for particular types of materials (e.g. photographs, books, journal articles, maps). When materials require a great deal of specialized knowledge to deal with, and the tools that are used to manage and provide access to the content are similarly specialized, it’s not hard to understand why this balkanization has happened. On occasion I’ve heard folks (/me points finger at self) bemoan the launch of a new website as the creation of “yet another silo”. But the technical silos that we perceive are largely artifacts of the social silos we work in: archives, special collections, rare books, maps, etc. The collections we break up our libraries into…the projects that mirror those collections. We need to work better together before we can build common digital preservation tools. To paraphrase something David Brunton has said to me before: we need to think of our collections more as sets of things that can be rearranged at will, with ease and even impunity. In fact the architecture of the Web (and each website on it) is all about doing that.

Even though it can be tough (particularly in large organizations) I think we can in fact achieve some levels of common tooling (in areas like storage and auditing); but we must admit (to ourselves at least) that some levels of access will likely always be specialized in terms of technical infrastructure and user interface requirements:

Some, though not all, data can be shoehorned into a digital library not optimised for them, but only at the cost of the affordances surrounding them. Consider data over which a complex Web-based interaction environment has been built. The data can be removed from the environment for preservation, but only at the cost of loss of the specialised interactions that make the data valuable to begin with. If the dataset can be browsed via the Web interface, a static Web snapshot becomes possible, but it too will lack sophisticated interaction. If the digital library takes on the not inconsiderable job of recreating the entire environment, it is committing to rewriting interaction code over and over again indefinitely as computing environments change.

Dorothea’s statement about committing to rewriting interaction code over and over again is important. I’m a software developer, and a web developer to boot — so there’s nothing I like more than yanking the data out of one encrusted old app, and creating it a-fresh using the web-framework-du-jour. But in my heart of hearts I know that while this may work for large collections of homogeneous data, it doesn’t scale very well for a vast sea of heterogeneous data. However, all is not lost. As the JISC are fond of saying:

The coolest thing to do with your data will be thought of by someone else.

So why don’t us data archivers get out of the business of building the “interaction code”. Maybe our primary service should be to act as data wholesalers who collect it, and make it available in bulk to those who do want to build access layers on top of it. Lets make our data easy for other people to use (with clear licensing) and reference (with web identifiers) so that they can annotate it, and we can pull back those annotations and views. In a way this is kind of hearkening back to the idea of Data Providers and Service Providers that was talked about a lot in the context of OAI-PMH. But in this case we’d be making the objects available as well as the metadata that describes them, similar to the use cases around OAI-ORE. I got a chance to chat with Kate Zwaard of the GPO at CurateCamp a few weeks ago, and learned how the new Federal Register is a presentation application for raw XML data being made available by the GPO. Part of the challenge is making these flows of data public, and giving credit where credit is due — not only to the creators of the shiny site you see, but to the folks behind the scenes who make it possible.

Another part of Dorothea’s essay that stuck out a bit for me, was the advice to split ingest, storage and access systems.

Ingest, storage, and end-user interfaces should be as loosely coupled as possible. Ideally, the same storage pool should be available to as many ingest mechanisms as researchers and their technology staff can dream up, and the items within should be usable within as many reuse, remix, and re-evaluation environments as the Web can produce.

This is something we (myself and other folks at LC) did as part of the tooling to support the National Digital Newspaper Program. Our initial stab at the software architecture was to use Fedora to manage the full life cycle (from ingest, to storage, to access) of the newspaper content we receive from program awardees around the US. The only trouble was that we wanted the access system to support heavy use by researchers and also robots (Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, etc) building their own views on the content. Unfortunately the way we had put the pieces together we couldn’t support that. Increasingly we found ourselves working around Fedora as much as possible to squeeze a bit more performance out of the system.

So in the end we (and by we I mean David) decided to bite the bullet and split off the inventory systems keeping track of where received content lives (what storage systems, etc) from the access systems that delivered content on the Web. Ultimately this meant we could leverage industry proven web development tools to deliver the newspaper content…which was a huge win. Now that’s not saying that Fedora can’t be used to provide access to content. I think the problems we experienced may well have been the result of our use of Fedora, rather than Fedora itself. Having to do multiple, large XSLT transforms to source XML files to render a page is painful. While it’s a bit of a truism, a good software developer tries to pick the right tool for the job. Half the battle there is deciding on the right granularity for the job … the single job we were trying to solve with Fedora (preservation and access) was too big for us to do either right.

Having a system that’s decomposable, like the approach that CDL is taking with Microservices is essential for long-term thinking about software in the context of digital preservation. I guess you could say “there’s no-there-there” with Microservices, since there’s not really a system to download–but in a way that’s kind of the point.

I guess this is just a long way of saying, Thanks Dorothea! :-)

by ed at August 24, 2010 05:43 PM

Meredith Farkas

What’s the deal, JSTOR?

I’ve written some posts in the past about vendors that have done some pretty slimy things in the name of making a profit. At least that makes sense to me. That’s their model — they’re profit-driven. Then there’s JSTOR. JSTOR is not an EBSCO or an Elsevier. JSTOR is a non-profit. JSTOR is a “service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive of over one thousand academic journals and other scholarly content.” While JSTOR has always been a bear to search, I have never thought of JSTOR as a company that would make decisions that were bad for users in the name of making money. But this new development has me scratching my head.

I’m sure anyone working in an academic library has already heard that the JSTOR interface was changing this summer. Well, how nice that they wait to finally make the change live the week that students are coming back to most schools. One of our librarians attended a webinar on the new interface and reported about it to the rest of the staff so we were pretty prepared for what was coming in terms of the interface change. But the thing that’s a really big deal is that JSTOR is now going to display everything in their collection by default. That probably doesn’t matter to a large University that subscribes to every JSTOR collection known to man, but for libraries of small to medium size that only subscribe to maybe 4 or fewer collections, your students will suddenly be seeing a lot of results in JSTOR that they can’t access. I did a search on World War II and Poland and out of the first 10 results there were only 2 that were in the JSTOR collections we subscribe to. If a student clicked on one of the eight of ten results that did not have a green check mark to the right of it they would see this:

Is this really the patron's only option?

What’s interesting is that we actually have many of these articles available in full-text through other databases.

I know what you’re probably thinking — “every database displays things that aren’t available in full-text. You can just enable your link resolver and students will be able to link to the full-text.” That would be nice, but JSTOR has decided not to make that possible. The response we got from tech support was “OpenURL links are not currently available when your users arrive at articles in collections that you do not license.” So, we can link out from full-text articles in JSTOR to versions of the same full-text in other collections, but we can’t link out from articles we do not have the full-text of in JSTOR to full-text in other collections. Either a lot of smart people don’t understand the purpose of OpenURL or they really don’t want to make it easy for students to figure out that their library has access to these resources through another database.

The other response we got was this: “At this time it is also not possible to change the default search to just your licensed collections.” Students can check a box on the Advanced Search page only that will “Include only content I can access”, but how many students are going to 1) notice that check box and 2) know what it really means? Especially when the default option (the box already checked) says “Include links to external content” and the explanation next to it says “JSTOR displays citation information and an outside link to the full-text of some recently published articles on external sites.” It makes it sound like students can get more full-text content that way when the reality is that they’ll just get more results that ask them to pay $12 or $30 for the article.

The tech support person went on to state “I will make sure that your suggestion of setting default search limits, and expanding OpenURL links to cover all non-licensed content, is passed on to our development team for consideration.” I have to call BS here. I can’t believe that these were not conscious decisions on their part. Was this developed by one lone dude in a shack with no input from other designers and librarians? I have to believe that they can’t be surprised that libraries would want these features.

I refuse to believe that all of the smart people at JSTOR have no idea how OpenURL works and have no idea how pretty much every other database vendor in the known world operates these days. Even if they were clueless, JSTOR has advisory boards made up of librarians who could tell them how things work. So my first thought was clearly they want to confuse students into paying for access to articles they could get through another database or ILL. But then I remember that this is JSTOR. They’re a not-for-profit. Something is clearly going on behind the scenes that we’re missing the boat on. And the first thing that pops into my head is PUBLISHERS. Are the pressures of publishers pulling out of JSTOR to pursue lucrative deals with EBSCO become to much? Did you have to make concessions that benefit your publishing partners but hurt the end user? I do understand that this change will make it easier for people not affiliated with a library to search JSTOR (helping to increase their base of individuals purchasing articles), but there is no reason that they couldn’t at the same time give libraries the ability to customize the default at their institutions or to make OpenURL work across the board.

So which one is it, JSTOR? Are you really that clueless about how modern databases and OpenURL link resolvers work? Are you out to make a buck off confused Freshmen with credit cards? Or did your publishing partners force you into it? Either way, you’re putting the customer dead last in this equation and, IMHO, breaking a trust relationship you’ve had with librarians for many years. I know that my solution to this will be simple. I just won’t teach JSTOR to social science majors here and will encourage students to use WorldCat Local. JSTOR articles are indexed in WC Local, so students can find the articles there and use Serials Solutions 360 Linker to link out to whichever database holds the full-text. Problem solved. And I doubt I’ll be the only librarian looking for a way around teaching JSTOR in information literacy classes if JSTOR doesn’t make a change ASAP. Way to make yourself less visible to future scholars, JSTOR!

I’ll be really curious to see how this shakes out, because I can’t imagine we’re the only library that’s going to be very negatively impacted by JSTOR’s bad decisions. I hope they make a change, and soon, because my History and Political Science info lit classes are coming in just a couple of weeks.

Update: For those who think that this is already resolved or have mentioned that you’re seeing a link resolver link to some articles, let me explain what you’re looking at as I’ve done a bit more digging. There are three types of results you can get right now in JSTOR, and you’ll see each in this screenshot (sorry for the size, my computer is being wonky — just click on it to expand it):

JSTOR results

JSTOR results

The first (with the gray asterisk) is from a journal that is not in a JSTOR collection we subscribe to. There will be no link resolver link that lets patrons easily get to the article in another database to to our library’s ILL form. Frequently, there will be something that tells the user they need to pay to access the article. Otherwise, it’ll just be a dead end.

The second (with the green check mark) is an article that is in our JSTOR collection. Students can click on the title and get to the full-text.

The third (with the yellow arrow) is from a journal this is in our JSTOR collection, but it is not from the date range of full-text that is available through JSTOR (in this case, the article is from 2006 and JSTOR’s coverage goes to 2005). Clicking on the title of this type of result will provide a link resolver link so that the patron can check to see if the library has this in full-text elsewhere.

For those who are seeing link resolver links right now, what you are seeing is the third type of link. You may just have too many JSTOR collections to easily get a result in the second category which is very lucky for you.

by Meredith Farkas at August 24, 2010 05:15 PM

LISWire

LISWire: Call for Papers -- Modern Librarian

Modern Librarian is currently accepting manuscripts for its inaugural issue. The journal's mission is to advance the the profession of librarianship and those who practice it, as well as to examine those questions and challenges faced by the institutions and practitioners of library science. We are dedicated to encouraging and publishing scholarship that is focused on the challenges of librarianship. We particularly encourage work that is grounded in empirical research, but other forms of scholarship are also welcome.

Interested parties should see the journal's submission information page for more information.

August 24, 2010 04:03 PM

LISWire: Chadron State College Looking to EBSCO Discovery Service™ to Augment its Information Literacy Goals

~ EBSCO Discovery Service™ Plus an Information Literacy 101 Class Designed to Combine Convenience with Improved Critical Thinking ~

IPSWICH, Mass. — August 24, 2010 — Chadron State College has chosen EBSCO Discovery Service™ (EDS) from EBSCO Publishing (EBSCO) as part of its overall goal to improve information literacy. The college was looking to wean students off typical search engines while encouraging students to access valuable library resources by reducing the intimidation factor that searching the OPAC typically causes.

The goal was to provide students with a search system that offers the convenience they are accustomed to from searching online while delivering the rich resources they need to complete their assignments—a single search box yielding rich results from the library collection. Providing a single search experience and encouraging critical thinking to improve student assignments were additional factors that brought faculty support for EDS and a new required course.

Director of Chadron’s Reta E. King Library Milton Wolf says the aphorism data, data everywhere but not a thought to think is proving true on college campuses and libraries have to weigh the convenience factor with the need to push students to use the best, vetted, proprietary information. “We know students are not using the OPAC, it is too complex and has become too rarified for students who have become accustomed to searching online—and to making do with the less than adequate results that come from those searches. We know we need to go where the users are; providing the convenience of a single search box while ensuring that the results will bring the user to quality information. With EDS, we can make sure that the first page of results our students see will be far better than the first page of results from a typical search engine.” Customization options available in EDS, including the ability to import Lib Guides, will allow Chadron State to further hone results to direct students to the highest usage materials available in a given subject.

Wolf says the college chose EDS after looking at several discovery systems because of EBSCO’s long history in the library business and because of the company’s plan for discovery. “EBSCO’s discovery strategy is the best possible of any other company and the EBSCO system is the best system out there.”

The addition of EDS comes before Information Literary 101 is added to the course list. Information Literary 101 is a required course being introduced in the fall of 2011. The information literacy course is designed to highlight resources like EBSCO Discovery Service but also to teach students to be critical about the information they are receiving. Wolf says the library staff worked to gain faculty support for the new course and had to show that students will be better informed and better able to do research to find the information they need in their classes.

While improved researching skills leading to more critical thinking and better course work are the college’s goals, Wolf says the benefits are expected to graduate along with students. “Being ‘information literate’ extends beyond school. The type of critical thinking that will come from the required course and the exposure to the resources in EDS will benefit students well beyond their college years—people need to determine how to find quality information from online resources and exposing them to rich library resources and encouraging them to consider the source material will have long term benefits.”

EBSCO Discovery Service creates a unified, customized index of an institution’s information resources, and an easy, yet powerful means of accessing all of that content from a single search box—searching made even more powerful because of the quality of metadata and depth and breadth of coverage.

The Base Index for EBSCO Discovery Service forms the foundation upon which each EDS subscribing library builds out its custom collection. Beginning with the Base Index, each institution extends the reach of EDS by adding appropriate resources including its catalog, institutional repositories, EBSCOhost and other databases, and additional content sources to which it subscribes. It is this combination that allows a single, comprehensive, custom solution for discovering the value of any library’s collection.

The EDS Base Index is comprised of metadata from the world’s foremost information providers. At present, the EDS Base Index represents content from approximately 20,000 providers in addition to metadata from another 70,000 book publishers. Although constantly growing, today the EDS Base Index provides metadata for nearly 50,000 magazines & journals, approximately 825,000 CDs & DVDs, nearly six million books, more than 100 million newspaper articles, more than 20,000 conference proceedings and hundreds of thousands of additional information sources from various source-types.

About EBSCO Publishing
EBSCO Publishing is the world’s premier database aggregator, offering a suite of more than 300 full-text and secondary research databases. Through a library of tens of thousands of full-text journals, magazines, books, monographs, reports and various other publication types from renowned publishers, EBSCO serves the content needs of all researchers (Academic, Medical, K-12, Public Library, Corporate, Government, etc.). The company’s product lines include proprietary databases such as Academic Search™, Business Source®, CINAHL®, DynaMed™, Literary Reference Center™, MasterFILE™, NoveList®, SocINDEX™ and SPORTDiscus™ as well as dozens of leading licensed databases such as ATLA Religion Database™, EconLit, Inspec®, MEDLINE®, MLA International Bibliography, The Philosopher’s Index™, PsycARTICLES® and PsycINFO®. Databases are powered by EBSCOhost®, the most-used for-fee electronic resource in libraries around the world. EBSCO is the provider of EBSCO Discovery Service™ a core collection of locally-indexed metadata creating a unified index of an institution’s resources within a single, customizable search point providing everything the researcher needs in one place—fast, simple access to the library’s full text content, deeper indexing and more full-text searching of more journals and magazines than any other discovery service (www.ebscohost.com/discovery). For more information, visit the EBSCO Publishing Web site at: www.ebscohost.com, or contact: information@ebscohost.com.

EBSCO Publishing is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., one of the largest privately held companies in the United States.
###
For more information, please contact:
Kathleen McEvoy
Public Relations Manager
(800) 653-2726 ext. 2594
kmcevoy@ebscohost.com

August 24, 2010 03:24 PM

Kathryn Greenhill

Proud mum … Broadband Innovation, Lego Club and Tim Winton

… you can skip this post if you are here for the library tech. This one fits in the “balancing and being mum” bit of the blog tagline.

I’m insanely proud of my family this week.

BROADBAND INNOVATION AWARD

My husband, Stewart, was instrumental in developing  the software for discerning unusual patterns in video surveillance footage for the Icetana company, which grew out of his research group at Curtin University. Last week the company pitched to over 400+ potential investors, mentors, entrepreneurs and customers at the Tech 23 event in Sydney – and won $25 000 from the New South Wales Government for the “Broadband Innovation Award”.

(Of course, I can bring librarianship into this one – check out another one of the finalists – readcloud , which claims to be “the world’s first social ereading software”. It uses the ebook itself as the platform for social discussion about the book’s content. This Australian firm is not to be confused with Copia, which claims to be “the first social eReading experience designed so you can discover, connect and share what’s meaningful” – but they do this by integrating a website and a their own ereading device )

LEGO

Then today my Mr12 came second in his school’s Lego club “Science Fiction City” building competition. He instigated the group last year and it has been a source of many, many hours of joy for him and his mates at lunch times. The support teachers are in on the act and buy ridiculously attractive large Lego sets as prizes that whip the kids up into a frenzy of creativity. Mr12 let on that they have a “Greenhill Award” in the club for each term’s competition – for whoever “shows spirit and never gives up”.

WRITING

Libraries again… Last night Mr7 had his turn to shine. The family attended the Tim Winton Award for Young Writers’ Ceremony at Subiaco Library – complete with canapes and a string quartet. Mr7 was a finalist in the Junior Primary Category. In another show of great support from the kids’ school, the Head of Junior School attended to be there for Mr7.  The competition received 1634 entries in five categories. I was very, very proud when Mr7 was awarded Second Prize in his category for his story “North Goes on Holiday”. Mr7 was very, very thrilled to read the congratulations that were tweeted from my friends on Twitter and I’m not sure he’s stopped grinning yet…

by Kathryn Greenhill at August 24, 2010 01:01 PM

Stephen Abram

Feeling Overwhelmed?

Are you feeling overwhelmed as the school year starts or September’s priorities arrive?

Chris Brogan is this nice little video that reminds us that we have choices. The reminders in this are useful.

Not Time Management

The video is ony 3 minutes so what can you lose?

And yes I was distracted by the bookshelf options for managing time behind Chris.

Stephen

by admin at August 24, 2010 12:16 PM

Discovering Education Blogs

Finding education blogs is now easier:

“Edublogs has just launched a brand new directory of education blogs. The directory is divided into fourteen categories covering most K-12 subjects, library blogs, and professional blogs. Although the directory is hosted by Edublogs, the directory is not limited to blogs hosted by Edublogs. Anyone can submit his or her blog to be added to the directory. And if you’re into blog badges, Edublogs provides a blog directory badge that you can display on your blog. (found here)”

The Edublogs Blogs Directory

Professional/Personal Blog
Elementary/Primary Blog
English/Language Arts
Foreign Languages
History/Social Studies
Mathematics/Sciences
English as a Second Language
Technology Education
Art, Music and Theater
Library Blog
School News Blog
Vocational
Education and Training
Student Blog
Miscellaneous

Stephen

by admin at August 24, 2010 10:31 AM